266 MEKUir.L. 



A sj)ecies closely allied to and ])i)s.sil)jy identical with lidinlid (Iciisi/lont (Wall.) 

 Beiitl)., the type of the genus ^tijlocorijnu Cav. (not Hti/locoryiic Wight & 

 Aril.). The transfer to Randia is usually credited to Maxiniowicz, but F.-Villar's 

 cond)ination has priority. 'I'lif lypc was from Cavite Province, collected by NA> 

 in 17i>.'{. The same form was also collcclcd by llaenke, a colleague of Xec, speci- 

 mens of whose exist in the Prague lli'rbarium aii<l in the Berlin IJerbarium, 

 both of which \ have exaTuined. 



Randia wallichii Hook. f. Fl. Brit. Ind. 3 (ISSO) IKi; Forl)es & llemsl. 

 in Journ. Linn. Soc. hot. 23 (1888) 382; Ceron Cat. PI. Herb. (18<)2) l)."). 



Jfaiidia fitzalani Elm. Leatl. IMiilip. Bot. 1 (190G) 31; Merr. in Philip, dourn. 

 Sci. 1 (190G) Suppl. 13(», lion F.-Muell. 



This species was reported from the Philippines by Ceron, 1. c, the identifica- 

 tion of Vidal's specimen having been made by Rolfe. After an examination of the 

 material rej)resenting this species in the Kow Herbarium, 1 can see no reason 

 ft)r distinguishing the Philippine form from tlie species described by Hooker f. 

 The Australian Ranilin filzdhtni F. Muell., is different, and the Philippine forni 

 can not be referred to it. In addition to the numerous specimens from the 

 Province of Bataan, cited by myself I. c under Randia fitzalani. and wiiicii must 

 all be referred to R. irallicliii, 1 have examined the following specimens: 



Luzon, Province of Benguet, Baguio, Ehner .')'.).il, '>!)!).'i, March, 1904: Province 

 of Hocos Sur, For. Jiitr. MU.'t Klemme, November, 1906: Province of Zambales, 

 Subic, Hallier, January, 1904; Botolan, Merrill 2D8S, June, 1903: Province of 

 Principe, Baler, Merrill llOS, September, 1902: Province of Batangas, For. Bur. 

 l(i'i'), ll-'jl Viirran d Merritt, October, November, 1907: Province of Pangasinan, 

 Hiir. Sci. ',S.',', Riiiiios. December, 1907: Far. liiir. S.IH Curran t(- Merrill, 

 December, 1907: I'rovince of lli/.al, Bosoboso. Mirrill .'ii.i'. .lune 1903; Fur. liar. 

 3095 Ahern's collector, May, 1904. 



British India to Yunnan and .lava. 



UNCARIA Schrel). 



Uncaria velutina Havil. in dourii. Linn. Soc. Itol. 33 (1S97) 84. 



\(tt((l<<i ranesccn.<i Bartl. in DC. Prodr. 4 (]S3(i) 34(1. iiou I iifaria cdnesecns 

 Jvorth. 



Nduclea clavisepaUi Kim. Leall. Piiilip. Bot. 1 (1908) 3.")0. 



Luzon, without locality, Haenke, in Herb. Prague: Province of Camarines Sur, 

 Cuming I'/IO: without locality, Cuminy JoO.i: Province of Laguna, Los Bafios. 

 Elmer 8262, April, I90ti (type of i'ncaria cldriscixiln lOliii.!). Masijatk, ]iil(il 

 2952. 



The type of this species is ('iiiiiiin/ l-'iU.l. given by Ha\il;iiu! (iiiough error as 

 no. 503. I have examined the specimens collected by Cuming and N'idal in Herb. 

 Kew, and the specimen collected by Haenke, type of Naiielea eane.'ieen.^ Bartl.. 

 in Herb. Prague, as well as Elmer H262. a specimen of which is in our Herbarivnn. 

 as is fragment of Cuininfi 15ll.i. Elmer's s])ecimen exactly matches Cuming's, 

 except that the former is in ilowei- and the later in fruit. Ilaviland states 1. c. 

 that he had not seen the type of Snuiha eiineseen.s. but that judging from the 

 description, it appeared to be the same as I'ncaria nlulinu. After an examina- 

 tion of llaenke's s|)ecinien 1 am able to atrirm tlie identity of the two species. 

 IJartling's s|)ecific name, although the earlie-l one. is untenable in I iiciirin on 

 account of tlie later use of the same name by Koiihals. for a dill'ereiil species. 



Endemic. 



