FLORA MONTANA FORMOS.i: 49 



whicli is quite different from the others. The specimens are, 

 however, in too imperfect a state either for determination or 

 description. 



Corydalis sp. 



Hab. Taito : Daironkosha, leg. T. Kawakami et U. Mori, 

 Nov. 1906, (Nos. 2170 et 2183). 



Cruciferae. 

 Avahis Linn. 



In the lowland flora we have had nothing of Arahh. On the high 

 elevations, there are found three species belonging to the genus. 



Arabis alpina Linn. Sp. PL ed-2. p. 928 ; DC. Prodr. L p. 142 ; 

 Hook. f. et Thoms. in Joarn. Linu. See. V. p. 141 ; Hook. f. et Anders, in 

 Hook. f. Fl. Brit, Ind. L p. 135 ; Diels, Fl. Centr. Chin, in Engl. 

 Bot. Jahrb. XXIX. p. 359 ; Ledeb. Fl. Ross. L p. 117 ; Hook, et Arn. Bot. 

 Beech. Toy. p 112 ; Wagner, Deut. Fl. ed-3, p. 290 ; Thome', Fl. Deut. 

 Ost. u. Schw. II. p. 175. 



Arahis albida Stev. ; DC. Prodr. I. p. 142. 



Arabis 'pterosperma Edgew. iu Tran. Linn. Sec. XX. p. 33. 



Hab. in monte Morrison, leg. T. Kawakami et U. Moki, Oct. 

 1906, (No. 223). 



DiSTEiB. Asia, from Altai westward to Europe ; east Hima- 

 laya, central China northward to east Siberia. 



My specimen does not quite agree witli the description of 

 A. alpina Linn. It seems to me that the plant differs a little from 

 the type in its individual character only. The leaves of the present 

 form are subentire, while those of tlie type are more or less dentate. 



Arabis taraxacifolia Andep^s. ; Hook. f. et Anders, in Hook. f. Fl. 

 Brit. Ind. I. p. 13G. 



