Vol. 2 AMARANTHACEAE 127 
EXCLUDED SPECIES 
DEERINGIA ALTISSIMA F, Muell.; F.-Vill. Novis. App. (1880) 167. 
2. CELOSIA Linnaeus 
CELOSIA ARGENTEA Linn. Sp. Pl. (1753) 205; Blanco Fl. Filip. (1837) 
192, ed. 2 (1845) 185, ed. 3, 1 (1877) 248; Walp. in Nov. Act, Acad. 
Nat. Cur. 19 (1848) Suppl. 1: 407; Miq. Fl. Ind. Bat. 1* (1858) 
1028; Vidal Phan. Cuming. Philip. (1885) 187, Rev. Pl. Vasc. Filip. 
(1886) 216; F.-Vill. Novis. App. (1880) 167; Merr. FI. Manila 
(1912) 190, Sp. Blancoanae (1918) 137. 
Throughout the Philippines at low and medium altitudes in the settled 
areas; an introduced weed. Pantropic. 
Local names: Kadayohan (Tag.); kindayohan (Tag.); kudiapa (Bis.) ; 
lof6i (Ilk.); sansandok (Ilk.); tagughug (P. Bis.). 
CELOSIA CRISTATA Linn. Sp. Pl. (1753) 205; Blanco Fl. Filip. (1837) 
191;.Miq. Fl. Ind. Bat. 1* (1858) 1027; F.-Vill. Novis. App. (1880) 
167; Merr. Sp. Blancoanae (1918) 137. 
Celosia coccinea Linn. Sp. Pl. ed. 2 (1762) 297; Blanco FI. Filip. ed. 
2 (1845) 184, ed. 3 1 (1877) 241, t. 64. 
In fairly common cultivation for ornamental purposes, rarely sponta- 
neous or subspontaneous; the cockscomb, introduced. All warm countries. 
Local names: Daling-manuk (Sul.); padong-padéngan (Bis.); palong- 
manok (Tag.) ; palong-paluhgan (Bik., Tag.) ; papaknongon-manok (Bik.) ; 
taptapingar (Ilk.). 
DOUBTFUL AND EXCLUDED SPECIES 
CELOSIA PHILIPPICA Steud. Nomencl. ed. 2, 1 (1841) 316; Moq. in DC. 
Prodr. 137 (1849) 241; Miq. Fl. Ind. Bat. 1* (1858) 1027; F.-Vill. 
Novis. App. (1880) 168. 
Lestibudesia philippica Weinm. in Syll. Ratisb. 1 (1828) 118. 
“In ins. Lucon prope Manillam” Moquin. I do not recoynize the species, 
which may not have been from the Philippines. 
CELOSIA CERNUA Juss.; F.-Vill. Novis. App. (1880) 168. 
CELOSIA PHYTOLOCCAEFOLIA Juss.; F.-Vill. 1. c. 
CELOSIA BICOLOR Blanco FI. Filip. (1837) 191; Merr. Sp. Blancoanae 
(1918) 388. 
Celosia glauca Blanco op. cit. ed. 2 (1845) 135, ed. 8, 1 (1877) 242, 
non Rottl. . 
Fernandez-Villar referred this to Celosia philippica Steud., but Blanco’s 
description presents nothing in common with that of the latter species. 
The form described by Blanco was certainly no amaranthaceous plant, and 
may possibly have been a species of Ammannia of the Lythraceae; I can- 
not determine its. status from the imperfect description. 
3. ALLMANIA R. Brown 
ALLMANIA ALBIDA R. Br. in Wall. Cat. (1832) No. 6981, nomen nu- 
dum; F.-Vill. Novis. App. (1880) 168, Rev. Pl. Vase. Filip. (1886) 
216, Phan. Cuming. Philip. (1885) 1387. 
Chamissoa albida Mog. in DC. Prodr. 13% (1849) 248, non Mart. 
