204 ENUMERATION OF PHILIPPINE PLANTS 1923 
ENDIANDRA LAXIFLORA Merv. in Philip. Journ. Sci. 11 (1916) Bot. 182. 
Luzon (Apayao, Tayabas), Samar, Mindanao (Agusan), F. B. 25416 La- 
bitag, 25423 Duldulao, B. S. 24280, 24426 Ramos, 28110 Fénix, Elmer 13434. 
In primary forests at low and medium altitudes. Endemic. 
Local name: Malagasaha (Tag.). 
14. LINDERA Thunberg 
LINDERA APOENSIS Elm. Leafl. Philip. Bot. 2 (1910) 714. 
Mindanao (Davao), Agusan, Lanao, Hlmer 11640, Clemens 987, F. B. 
24350 Cortez & Fernandez. In primary forests, altitude 700 to 1,200 m. 
Endemic. 
Local names: Hindang (Mbo.); sarirab (Bag.). 
EXCLUDED SPECIES 
LINDERA ACUMINATA (Blume) F.-Vill. Novis. App. (1880) 181. 
LINDERA CAESIA (Reinw.) F.-Vill. 1. c. 
LINDERA MELASTOMACEA (Nees) F.-Vill. 1. ¢. 
LINDERA STRYCHNIFOLIA (S. & Z.) F.-Vill. op. cit. 182. 
15. ITEADAPHNE Blume 
ITEADAPHNE PHILIPPINENSIS Elm. Leafl. Philip. Bot. 2 (1910) 713. 
Mindanao (Davao), Elmer 11493. In primary forests, altitude about 
1,800 m. Endemic. 
Local name: Boga (Bag.). 
16. CASSYTHA Linnaeus 
CASSYTHA FILIFORMIS Linn. Sp. Pl. (1753) 35, ed. 2 (1762) 530; 
Blanco F). Filip. (1837) 321, ed. 2 (1845) 226, ed. 3, 2 (1878) 58; 
Mig. Fl. Ind. Bat. 1* (1858) -977; Meisn. in DC. Prodr. 15° 
(1864) 255; F.-Vill. Novis. App. (1880) 182; Merr. in Philip. 
Journ. Sci. 3 (1908) Bot. 407, Fl. Manila (1912) 211, Sp. Blanco- 
anae (1918) 155. 
Cassytha capillaris F.-Vill. Novis. App. (1880) 182, non Meisn. 
Batan Islands to Palawan and Mindanao. In thickets, especially near the 
sea, parasitic on various coarse grasses, shrubs, ete.; in dry regions 
sometimes found inland up to an altitude of 500 m. Pantropic. 
Local names: Barutbarut (Ilk.); kauad-kauad (Tag.); kauad-kauaran 
(Tag.); kauat-kauat (Sul.); malabohok (Bik., Bis., Tag.) ; uauaken-irang 
(Iv.). 
EXCLUDED GENUS 
LAURUS LANOSA Blanco FI. Filip. (1837) 318, ed. 2 (1845) 224, ed. 3, 2 
(1878) 54; Meissn. in DC. Prodr. 15’ (1864) 259; Merr. in Govt. 
Lab. Publ. (Philip.) 27 (1905) 74, Sp. Blancoanae (1918) 155. 
This is possibly a Cryptocarya, but its exact identity is indeterminable 
from Blanco’s imperfect description. It has nothing to do with Litsea 
villosa Blume to which it was reduced by F.-Villar. 
