202 ROSACEAE 



(1813) 91, as a species), Godet in Fl. du Jura, i. 215 (1852). R. canina, 

 var. ramosissima, Rau, Enuni. Rosar. Wirceb. 74 (1816). 



1. Isis. Wythani. Appleton. 2. Ock. Wootton, with a form 



having slightly biserrate leaves, 1882. 3. Pang. Compton, 



F. A. Rogers. 4. Kennet. Peasemore, W. M. Rogers. Near 



Newbuiy. 5. Loddon. Long Moor. Blackwater. 

 Specimens of the above in my collection, named senticosa by our British 

 exjjerts, are placed in the Lutetiana group by M. Crepin. 

 R. canina is found in all the bordering counties. 



R. sarmentacea, Woods, in Linn. Soc. Trans, xii. (1817) 213. 



R. canina, var. glandulosa, Rau, Enum. Rosar. Wirceb. 75 (1816. 

 Var. clumalis, Dumort. in Bull. Soc. Bot. Belg. vi. (1867) 58. 

 R. clumalis, Bechst. Forstbot. ed. 5, 582 (1843). 

 Syme, E. B. iii. 225. E. B. Suppl. t. 2595. Fl. Oxf. 107. 

 Isative. Septal. Hedges. Our commonest hedge-rose, after i?. canma, var. 

 Lutetiana, belongs to R. sarmentacea (the group clumalis of M. Crepin ; 

 it occurs plentifully in every district. Shrub. May-June. 

 First record. Godstow, Mr. W. T. Dyer in Britt. Contr. 187 1, and from 

 Bagley Wood by the author in Re2h of Bot. Rec. Cluh for 1881. 

 A very pretty form, which is more glandular than the type, occurs 

 on the east side of Boar's Hill. 

 In the group dumalis M. Crepin has placed my specimens named 

 surculosa, vinacea, and biserrata by our British experts. 



Var. VINACEA (Baker in Naturalist (1864) loi, as a species). 

 Near Cumnor and Wootton, and probably elsewhere. 

 Var. BISERRATA (Morat, Fl. Paris, ed. i, 190 (1812), as a species'. 

 Near Cumnor, Appleton, Sunningwell, &c., but is scarcely distinct 

 from the preceding. 



Half of our roses belong to the Lutetiana, urbica, and sarmentacea 

 forms. Next to these R. arvensis is our commonest form. 



Var. CAESiA (Smith in E. B. t. 2367 (181 1) as a species). R. canina, 



var. caesia, Hook. Fl. Scot. 157 (1821). Syme, E. B. iii. 218, t. 473 bis. 



' I think Mr. Baker so named a rose I brought from Wokingham, 



but the memorandum is temporarily mislaid,' Mr. H. C. Watson in 



Britt. Contr. 187 1. 



M. Crepin does not know our Rosa caesia, which is placed as a form 

 of i?, canina, var. arvatica, in Lond. Cat. ed. 9, 18. 



Var. pRuixosA (Baker in Naturalist, i. (1864) 96, as a species). 

 R. canina, var. j^ruinosa. Baker in Linn. Soc, Journ. xi. (1869) 230. 

 Syme, E. B. iii. 223. 



2. Ock. Near Abingdon. 



Var. Deseglisei (Boreau, Fl. du Centre Fr. ii. 224 (1857), as a species). 

 5. Loddon. Near Winkfield. (Named for me by M. Crepin.) 

 R. sarmentacea is recorded for all the bordering counties. 



