ACROLITA CONSEQUANA IN DEVON. 137 
are from Massachusetts, New York, New Hampshire; Orisaba, 
Jalapa, and elsewhere in Mexico. Strangely enough, it is not 
included in ‘ Biologia Centrali- Americana,’ i. (1883-1900), p. 288, 
although in the representative collection of that work are two 
females bearing (Mr. Champion tells me certainly) the MS. label, 
* peronatus, Cameron,” who perhaps had some doubt respecting 
its priority! This label I have destroyed. 
101. amictus.* —A single headless female of Schizoloma 
amicta, Fab. 
102. glaucopterus.—A fine female Opheltes glaucopterus, Linn. 
88. faleator.—This is certainly the same species as ‘‘ Banchus 
falcator,” Piez. 128, and not distinct, as given by Dalla Torre 
(Cat. iii. 64 et 142). It is neither a Banchus nor Campoplex, as 
its entire lack of areolet at once testifies. My knowledge of the 
Ophionine is not sufficient to enable me to name the single 
female in the collection, and I can but superficially describe it as 
a medium-sized Anomalon with the hind tarsi not spatuliform ; 
the abdomen, with the exception of the second segment discally, 
is centrally red, and both thorax and scutellum are entirely black. 
It cannot, I think, be the J. falcator of Ent. Syst. 
MS. Generic Lasen:—BRACON. 
47, Ichn. fastidiator* ; 49, I. proficiscator* ; 50, I. hospitator ; 
51, I. denunciator* ; 58, I. defensor* ; 56,:I. capitator* ; 46, I. 
desertor; 55, I. insidiator* ; 57, I. mutator* ; and ‘‘ Ichn. Assimi- 
lator, Nov. Act. Holm. 1787, p. 280,” of Swederus; are all Braco- 
nids, and do not fall within the scope of this paper. 
ACROLITA CONSEQUANA, H.-8., IN DEVON, WITH 
STRAY NOTES ON ITS HABITS, &c. 
By Eustace R. Banges, M.A., F.E.S., &c. 
Wirth reference to Mr. C. Granville Clutterbuck’s note (antea, 
p. 100) chronicling the discovery in South Devon, in July, 1907, 
of larve of Acrolita consequana, from which seven imagines 
were bred in the following month, it may be of interest to record 
the fact that I took this species in South Devon as long ago as 
August 18th, 1900. The moth being abundant throughout my 
visit, which terminated early in September, a nice series was 
secured, and either it or the larva has proved equally common 
in the other years in which the same locality has been explored. 
I also bred it in plenty, July 1st—August 27th, 1902, from 
larvee of all sizes collected there in the latter half of September, 
1901, and have distributed some of these Devonshire specimens, 
with full data, among various friends. 
