lines ; discal spots black; outer line gray, straight from costa, then rectangular 
outward, then rounding forming a deep sinus shorter than usual, then angulate 
and slightly bent to inner margin ; veins on middle and outer fields rather darker 
than ground color ; marginal line black; hind wings light fuscous, darker on the 
outer margin. 
Hab. —Texas. 
While writing the first part of this article, published last month, I 
thought it wise in view of doubts existing in my mind not to place in the 
list a species (Zallula atrifascialis) described by me as one of the £pr- 
paschine. 
I have been able by the sacrifice of one of my types to carefully 
study the species since and have concluded that it must be catalogued 
as one of the L£pipaschune. I therefore add it, merely noting my opinion 
that it would be best placed after Yama, and before Lanthaphe. 
TALLULA, Hulst. 
(Zallula, Indian name in Texas). 
Ento. Am., IV, 114, 1888. 
Palpi erect, long, thin ; end member comparatively long. Maxillary palpi present, 
not bilobed, but end member nearly at summit of 2nd. Antenne heavily bitufted 
pubescent in both sexes, but more prominently in -j'. Process almost obsolete. 
Tongue strong, clothed with long scales in front at base. Wings with scale ridges 
and tuftings, without costal scaie ridge and vitrifaction beneath ; apex somewhat 
sharper than usual, j' genitalia normal, with furcate base of uncas bent upward. 
Legs—tarsi spinulated, hind tibize with 2 pair of spurs. Venation—fore wings 12 veins; 
1 bent, not notched, nor furcate, 3 close to angle, 4 and 5 short stemmed, 6 at a point 
with 7, 7, 8 and g stemmed, 10, 11 and 12 separate. Hind wings 8 veins; 3 close to 
angle, 4 and 5 short stemmed, 6 short stemmed with 7, 7 stemmed with 8 beyond 
separation from 6; cell short. 
Notwithstanding the 12 veins of the fore wings, this species is very 
closely allied to the PAycztide. But, as the result of careful study I think 
now that it must be placed with the Zpzpaschune. The lack of bilobing 
in the maxillary palpi is the most serious objection to such a reference, 
and the antennal process is almost obsolete, but otherwise its affinities 
are here. Still the end member of the maxillary palpi is not on the 
summit of the next and the process is clearly indicated. 
It does not seem to me the difficulty would be lessened by referring 
it to the Pyraldine, but rather much increased. 
It has been suggested to me that this species might be An@egls dis- 
missalis, Led., since Lederer’s figure very strongly resembles it. But 
Aneglis has neither tongue nor ocelli, apart from differences in venation. 
The original generic description was faulty owing to.a poor prepar- 
ation for study. The above corrected diagnosis can, I think, be relied 
upon. 
