56— 
West Indies and Mexico under that term, it is possible that a few may 
not belong to our fauna; JZyelors bilineatella Rag., M. duplipunctella 
Rag., Ortholepis jugosella Kag., Nephopleryx crassifasciella Rag., Mer- 
oplera uvinella Rag., Salebria Subyustitla Rag., Lpischnia ruderella Rag., 
£. granitella Rag., L. fulvinigella Rag., Diviana eudoreelia Rag., Sarata 
nigrifasciella Rag., Vitula ser Me iilinectia Rag., V. basimaculatella Rag. ; 
Homeosoma anguliferella Rag., Aurora longipalpella Rag., Mellisobliples 
Suscolimbellus Rag., Navasota hebetella Rag. : 
The following described without locality except N. America, I have 
obtained as follows, so they certainly belong to our fauna: Acrodasis 
palholella Rag. from Canada, Nephopleryx rubrisparseda Rag. from 
Texas, VV. rhypodella Hulst (curvatella Rag.) from Mlinois, and Sa/edria 
nubiferella Rag. from Texas. 
The following species described from the United States or British 
America are not in the catalogue in any way: Acrodasis nebulelia Riley, 
Nephopteryx subcanalis Walk., Stantira variegata Walk., Sebunta gut- 
tulosa Walk., Benta expandens Walk., Nephopleryx seminivella Walk. ,- 
Cutina albepunctella Walk., Szdbrita ? ior ostolella Walk., AL Lyeluis conrella 
Rag., AV. altensis Wocke, Cuepe punctilimbella Rag. Ace obasis demotella 
Grote, Sedunta guttulosa Walk.,—I am told = Bots wlibahs Hb. 
Of the species which Mr, Ragonot has not seen I can witli certainty 
determine the following : Nephopleryx aurantacella Grt. is Dioryetria 
miniatella Rag., Neph. caliginella Hulst is Acrod. compiella Rag., Mega. 
edwardsella Hulst is Megasis polyphemella Rag., Aner. excantella Hulst 
is Jeg. * pullatella Rag., Neph. perfuscella Hulst is Sar ala dophner ella 
Rag., Sperm. montinatella Hulst is Honora canicostella Rag., Neph. 
carneella Hulst is Neph. inquinitella Rag., Neph. edmunds Pack. is 
Vitula dentosella Rag. In all these cases Mr. Ragonot’s names become 
synonyms. Mr. Ragonot’s generic references however are probably correct. 
My present intention is to make no criticism upon Mr, Ragonot’s 
references of the species of other authors. I will only remark that on 
the basis of Prof. Zeller’s types in the Cambridge Museum his reference 
of Prof. Zeller’s species is not always correct. 
6.412 ———— 
Notes on Cerambycid Larve. 
The admirable work by the late Prof. J. C. Schicedte ‘‘De meta- 
morphosi Eleutheratorum observationes” published in 11 parts in Kroe- 
yer’s ‘‘ Naturhistorisk Tidsskrift” (vol. I—XI, 1862 —1880,) contains by 
far more than disconnected descriptions of Coleopterous larvee and their 
illustrations. The work ought to be in the hands of everyone interested 
in the early history of Coleoptera. The ‘‘Conspectus morphologicus ” 
