—49— 



Caberodes antidiscaria Wlk. I have one specimen only of this, but 

 have no doubt it is a good species. 



Eugonia vidularia Grt. This is a synonym of Tetrads grotearia 

 Pack. It differs in no respect from the ordinary J^ form, though it is a 

 trifle Hghter in color than the type. 



Eugonia magnana Guen. This species has for some years back 

 been pretty universally looked upon as being a synonym of a European 

 species. It ordinarily goes by the name E. alniaria Linn., but as Mr. 

 Moschler shows, E. autumnaria Wernb. is the species it most resembles, 

 and of this he believes it a synonym. As yet I hold it to be a valid 

 species. I have examined several specimens, and find the American 

 differs structurally from the European. In the venation of the fore wings, 

 both the European species have a subcostal and two accessory cells. The 

 American has a subcostal, but no accessory cells. On this ground I 

 retain Guenee's name for our species. 



Azelina hubnerata Guen. A close contestant with Caberodes con- 

 fusaria Hiib. in variability. I do not know how many tropical forms 

 nam'ed by Guenee, Walker and others may be included under this spe- 

 cies, but in the range of American material it includes A. stygiarial^W., 

 A. honestaria Wlk., A. behrensata Pack., A. morrisonaria Yiy . Edw. and 

 perhaps A . zalissaria Wlk. It includes forms with wings angulated and 

 unangulated, undulating on outer margins and without undulations, 

 with median space very broad and with lines almost coalescing, with 

 color varying through black, reddish, brown, and cinereous. 



Azelina zalissaria Walk. This seems to be very distinct from A. 

 hubnerata, but curiously enough, all the specimens I have seen have been 

 females. 



Azelina arizonaria Hy. Edw. Of this A, albomacularia Hy. Edw , 

 is a variety. 

 ^ Endropia textrinaria Grt. This seems to me to be a good species, 

 though Mr. Grote, probably unintentionally, left it out of his last Check 

 List 1882. 



Endropia warneraria Harvey. As Mr. Grote has observed, this is 

 the same as E. apiciaria Pack., and is the name of the species, as it anti- 

 dates the latter. I have seen no specimen in the various collections of 

 E. pilosaria Pack. From Dr. Packard's description the only material 

 difference is in the shape of the hind wings. But in view of the difference 

 in this respect of the two sexes of E. warneraria, I am inclined to believe 

 *F. pilosaria is not a distinct species The two species are at any rate very 

 near to each other. 



