agrees in every respect with the specimen figured here. The color is deep red- 

 dish-brown shaded with light brown in and beyond the cell. 



13. ScHiNiA VELUTiNA B. & McD. Eureka, Ut. Type $. 



14. EuzoPHORA STRiCALis B. & McD. Eureka, Ut. Type S . 



15. EuxoA PLAGiGERA Morr.? Eureka, Ut. 9. 



We utterly fail with a long series of specimens from various localities 

 before us to separate plagigera from olivalis Grt. ; there may be distinctions 

 that can only be recognized from a study of the types, but the species can cer- 

 tainly not be separated from the original descriptions alone. We have used 

 the name plagigera as it is the older of the two; olk'alis would apply just as well. 



16. LvcoPHOTiA vocALis Grt. Provo, Ut. S. 



An aberrant specimen with all maculation, except the ordinary spots, 

 obsolete. 



17. EuxoA CHORis Harv. Eureka, Ut. 9 . 



A very strongly marked specimen (see figs. 4 and 7). 



18. EuxoA ATROFUSCA Sm. ? Eureka, Ut. 9 . 



Our determination is doubtful. There are several species, notably 

 iieolelis Sm. and cocklei Sni. which are so closely allied that we find it hard to 

 separate them when not from type localities. The specimen figured agrees very 

 well with a co-type of atrofusca in our possession, as well as with a long series 

 from Colorado. 



19. EuxoA NOSTRA Sm. ? Eureka, Ut. $. 



Doubtfully referred to this species. The entire primaries to subterminal 

 line are almost uniform red-brown, a shade darker than in Hadena tignicolor. 

 In the photograph the insect is slightly out of focus, causing a blurred appear- 

 ance that does not exist in the original. 



