430 ^rKKitirj.. 



447 species described by Blanco are enumerated, with Latin translations 

 of tlie species tliat Blanco described as new. and accepting those that 

 Blanco ascribed 1i» other aiilhors wiihdiit ([uestion. The paper is of 

 little vahic and adds but vcrv lillk' to oui- aclual knowledge of Blanco's 

 s})ecies. The next i)apei- is \)y llasskai-l, jndjlished in Flora, vol. 47 

 (1864), pages 17-23, 49-59; this was intended to be a critical review 

 of the first edition of Blanco's woi'k. but was apparently discontinued 

 after the first tliirly-three S])ecies (k'scribcd by Blanco were considered, 

 l^atiu translations of Jllanco's dcsfript ions are gi\en and some ci'itical 

 notes, while some new names a])})ear, most of which must fall as synonyms. 

 JStill another I'eference supplied me by Dr. Robinson, is a review of 

 Blanco's "Flora de Filipinas" by George Tradescant Lay in the Chinese 

 Kepository 7: 422-437, 1838. Of this I have seen no copy, but Dr. 

 Eohinson informs me that it is of no scientific importaui^e, data regarding 

 about 15 species only being abstracted, with additions from the author's 

 observations. 



In the following paper notes on a number of Blanco's species are 

 included, the arrangement following my previous publication,- the page 

 references following the family names i-eferi'ing to that [)aper, 



MAGNOLIACEyE (p. 15). 



Kadsura blancoi Azaola is cxfliidcd from tlic Matjiioliacca' and referred to 

 I'lii/locrcne (p. 42.3) . 



ANONACE^E (p. 1(5) • 



Uvaria lanotan r.laiico, ed. 1, 4(i4. Unona latifolia IManeo, ed. 2, 324^ 

 MUrcphora lanolun (Blanco) Merr. in Govt. t>al). I'ul)l. 35 (I !)().')) 71. witli 

 description, synonomy and citation of specimens. 



NYMPILEACE.E ( i>. 17). 



Nymphaea lotus J'.lanco, ed. 1, 4r>(i; cd. 2, 317; e<l. 3, 2 (1S7S) 222; F.-Vill. 

 Nov. App. (1880) i), non Linn. 



Following Conard'' true Nymphxra lotus is fouiul in Africa and Madagascar 

 only, while the Asiatic-Malayan-Australian form ticatiMl hy various authors as 

 \'. /o/».s- is .V. iiiihrsciiis Willd., whicli name should l)c accc|)lcd for the l'hiiii.|iinc 

 plant. 



JMTT<)S1M)|{ACPLE (p. IS). 



Bursaria inermis I'daiico, ed. 2. 124; ed. 3, 1: 122, |H('\iously considered, after 

 F.\ illdi-. to he ])rol)al)ly identical with I'lilnximni m firnniiinii i>i .\il.. is more 

 ])ri.l)ahly identical with J'ill<>si,i>iiiin ikhIikIi inn {I'.laiieo) Merr. 'I'Ih' species 

 was really described hy Azaola and not hy HIdiico. accordiiii; to the latler's state- 

 ment. See .l/rr/i7/ in (;ovt. Lah. lMd)l. 35 ( llior)) IS. 



' I hid. 



■'t'linKflir/iixl. I'll!,. (1!MI.")) No. 4, l!IS. 



