‘Sacc. No fu answering to t 
69 
cincto. Sporulae elliptico-fusoideae, utrinque vel saltem basi 
25 
acutatae, biguttulatae, 7-8 x 2-5-3 4; sporophorae cylindrico- 
subulatae, apice acutae, 10-15 x 1-1°5 »; B- sporulae Gn lisdem 
vel discretis pycnidiis) filiformes, curvatae vel uncina 20-2 
x O-75-1 p ee brevioribus (5-8 » long.) subdigitall- 
formibus fie lta 
Hab. in stipitibas emortuis Solani tuberosi, Botley, Hants, 
AD, Cotton, Jan. 
taena-state exactly the same  pesananise is nota n the im- 
perfect state some of the pseudo-pycnidia had saly Adige es, 
were found in the. same pycnidi 
P. Solani presents certain similarities to the description of P. 
Tuiasnei, Sacc. (Annal. Mycol. i, 27), but shows also consider- 
able differences, which entitle it for the present to be treated as 
distinct, until it shall be demonstrated that they are both pve- 
nidia of Diaporthe Tulasnez, — Parkas aaong maculans is 
described by Fautrey as having s s 35 pw long, on sporo- 
phores about 12 y» po Mi there can ae little doubt that it is 
identical with this speci 
It should be noted that P. nitidula (no. 39) and P. Aristo- 
lochiae (no. 72) bear great similarity in certain aspects to P. 
Solant, and are also under suspicion of being possibly mere pyc- 
nidial stages of D. Tulasnez, but in the present state of mipia de 
it would be premature to unite all these under one name 
SPECIES EXCLUDED FOR THE PRESENT FROM THE BRITISH LIST. 
77. Phomopsis Coluteae, Died. in Annal, Mycol. 1911, ix. 
22. Phoma Coluteae, Sacc. et Roum. in Mich. ni. 338. 
Spores oblong-fusoid, T9 x 85-3 p; sporophores oblong- 
lanceolate, faintly coloured about as long as the spor 
“On branches of Colutea arborescens. Kew Gardens; Dal- 
ston.’’ The Kew echt which are marked ‘‘ forma minor, 
Spores 5 x 3», without nuclei,’ certainly do not belong to this 
species, but to Coniothyrium Fuckelii, which has spores reaching 
5 x 3 4; when young these spores are quite colourless, and may 
be easily ‘mistaken for a Phoma, but canis for a Phomopsis. The 
description given above is drawn from French specimens 
(Roumeguére, 911), which are undoubtedly a Phomopsis, though 
with unusually short sporopho 
78. Phomopsis Coronillae, Trav. l.c. p. 240. Phoma Coron- 
illae, Westd. Exs. no. 9 
Spas ovoid-oblong, 7-8 x 3 4; sporopheres filiform, arcuate, 
‘i op 
20 | 
8 On aus Saaschea of Coronilla Emerus and Backheeis halimi- 
folia. Kew Gardens.” The pycnidium of Diaporthe Coronillae. 
escription could be found 
ngus this 
on ae Kew specimens, Sehongli there were a Diplodia and a 
