152 
a ae 19 (1910), p. 16 et in reese Flor. Gén. Ind.-Chin. 
166, quoad spec. Cochchin 
Soha ae Bienhoa : Thorel 1064; Ti-tinh, Pierre, 6303 
in herb. Mus., Paris 
The Cochin-China specimens collected by Thorel and Pierre 
are no doubt nearly allied to S. lawrina, Wall., but differ in the 
‘leaves, the larger and more hairy anthers, and in the ovary 
being glabrous, except at the apex. 
S. ovalifolia, Wall., included by Clarke under S. een . 
a distinct species er to the long-tubed section of t 
genus (see p. 201). Under S. laurina, Clarke, and also King anil 
Gamble, sneladte Maingay’s . Malacca specimen no. 3393 ‘KD. 
1035). ‘Unfortunately there are no flowers, but the lenticels on 
the stems, the trinerved leaves with long acuminate tips and 
the fruits agree with those of S. Maingayi, Clarke, and the 
specimen has been placed under that species. The other plant 
but the leaves do not quite agree.* Another doubtful specimen 
ted R. 
is that collec by L. Keenan, at Shapore, Cachar; the 
specimen bears buds only and no hairs can be detected on the 
Whether S. laurina ranges into Indo-China, as Dop states, 
is uncertain in the absence of complete specimens, but from that 
region the plants appear to be very near to the type and are 
therefore considered as a variety. 
Helfer 3728 is placed by Clarke (l.c.) under S. acuminata, 
and by Dop under S. laurina. It is undoubtedly S$. lawrina 
with the flowers in bud ome and was Sollee not in the 
Andamans but in Tenasserim 
S. acuminata, Wall. Cat. 1593 i in ae (collected at migrate 
is a leaf specimen only (see A. DC. in DC. Prod. 
cluding specimen b and the Seok) but should no “doubt he 
referred to S. laurina. t Bentham (Journ. Linn. Soc. 103), 
nh that S. acuminata should be referred to S. omalshalias 
a 
Reference has already heen made to the Wallichian sheet 
4455 b. (see pp. 151 & 168) referred to by Clarke under S. Bed- 
* The specimens referred to by King & Gamble, lc. p. 826, in the footnote — 
to z eae have been described as a new species S. quadrangularis (see 
p- 
Ro. 2, which consists of three pubescent leaves and a pines oh stem, may be 
to S. rufa, C.B. Clarke. No. 3, also a leaf specimen, with large, 
conehaieen cea leaves is 8. Nua-blanda, A. W. Hill — p. 189}. 
i Se Sina are 
meio pier e i 
