397 
Mimosa divaricata Jacq. conspecific with L. Schiedeanum. Mac- 
bride accepted this identification and proposed the new combina- 
tion Lysiloma divaricata (Jacq.) for the species. Jacquin (Pl. Hort. 
Schoenbr. iii. 76, t. 395) both described and figured the calyx- 
lobes and corolla-lobes of M. divaricata as acute, and further 
described the corolla as glabrous and the pinnae as_ bearing 
forty pairs of leaflets. Bentham described L. Schiedeanum as 
having the corolla externally puberulous, the pinnae bearing 
twenty to thirty pairs of leaflets, and an examination of Sinclair’s 
specimen shows that the corolla-lobes are obtuse, and the calyx- 
lobes rounded. There seems to be no reason for uniting the 
two species. 
L. Watsoni Rose in CNH. i. 99 (1891); Zoe, v. 200. 
Cofradia, Brandegee. 
Standley (CNH. xxiii. 390) says that Z. Watsoni is known 
only from the vicinity of the type locality, Alamos, Sonora. 
I have not seen Brandegee’s specimen. 
. Sp.; Zoe, v. 200. 
Brandegee (l.c.) sesonite a Lysiloma from Sinaloa thus :— 
** Nearly glabrous, with large semicordate stipules that persist. 
Collected _) 2 an Near the plant collected by Pringle in 
Rincon Mts., : 
alliandra eas sg. Wats. in PAA. xvii. 352 (1882); Zoe, v. 
199.—C. formosa Standley in CNH. xxiii. 388, partim, non Benth. 
Near Culiacan, Brandegee. 
*“A form with 14-15 pairs of narrow leaflets and often four 
pairs of pinnae.” (Brandegee, l.c.). 
Standley (l.c.) says that C. Coulteri may be distinct ‘from 
C. formosa (Kunth) Benth. Comparison of Palmer 2129 (the 
type number) with the plate and description of Acacia formosa 
Kunth (Mimos. 102, t. 32) shows that C. Coulteri differs in having 
more numerous and much smaller leaflets, and smaller stipules 
which are lanceolate and acuminately acute instead of being 
oblong and obtuse. 
C. grandiflora (L’Heérit.) Benth. in Hook. Journ. Bot. 1840, 
ii. 139; et in Hook. Lond. Journ. Bot. 1844, iii. 111; SBH. 282; 
Benth. in Trans. Linn. Soc. xxx. 557; Hemsl. Biol. i. 357; Zoe, 
v. 199.—Mimosa grandiflora L’Hérit. Sert. Angl. 30 (1788): ; 
Ait. Hort. Kew. ed. i, iii. 441 (1789); Andr. Bot. Rep. ix. t. 592 
(1810); Ait. Hort. Kew. ed. 2, v. 469 (1813). Inga anomala 
Kunth, Mimos. 70, t. 22 (1820). Calliandra Kunthiit Benth. 
(1840). CC. anomala Macbride in Contrib. Gray Herb. n.s. lix. 4 
(1919); CNH. xxiii. 385. 
— de Pinal, fl. Dec. 1848, Seemann 1539; Cofradia, 
Brandeg 
Davies name ‘ Cabellito ”’ 
Macbride has proposed the new combination Calliandra 
anomala (Kunth) for the Mexican species hitherto commonly 
known as C. grandifiora (L’Heérit.). He maintains that “it is 
~ 
