154 
to which the locality cited presumably belongs, and second on 
ure and the specimen from which it was drawn, 
speci 
doubt we will Sonic them first. Redoute’s and Cupani’s speci- 
mens are not concerned in the original publication. 
There is an original sheet of Rosa glutinosa preserved in Sib- 
thorp’s Herbarium at Oxford, named, but unlocalised, except 
the specimen marked ‘‘a’’ only differs in having traces of these 
aciculi. In the younger specimens there is generally a copious 
development of the glandular aciculi on the branchlets. 
There is also a sheet from Sibthorp in the Natural History 
Museum, South Kensington. It is labelled as follows: “R. 
spent F. Graec., J. L.; aff. villosa, n. 8. Rosa parnasst, 
1 
th.” To this Crépin has added: ‘‘ Veros. R. Heckeliana, 
Tratt., Crép.”” “J. L.’’ represents Lindley, whilst the specific 
name, arnasst, Sibth., though not originally published, was 
2 now come to Tournefort’s original Cretan plant, which 
Temains uncertain, for the description is inadequate and no 
specimen is known. Tournefort’s specimens are at Paris, and 
ar. atrovirens, and R. glutinosa. Under 
resinosa, Stern. Spach 
Redoute’s figure, and R. sv. 
ehbateg de Bot. ii. (1813), p. 118, a Rose from the French Alps. 
at Kew. It is a fruitin 
figured by Sibthorp, and from its softly villous leaflets and 
petioles is apparently a luxuriant form of R. H eckeliana, Tratt., 
