508 TOE ORE YS: 
+B. unicornis Germ. Dawlish Warren, de la Garde. 
+B. SECERNENDUS Joy. Dawlish Warren, in quantity, dela Garde. This 
species appears in our latest List as a synonym of the var. subnager 
of Schneider, but as he considered his insect to be nothing more than 
a monstrosity, Joy's name must probably stand. 
Norr.—It is apparently strange that in the immediate noiehboutt 
hood of Plymouth the genus Bledius should be unkenreaenren 
Dyschirius, which preys upon the larve and pupe of Bledius, is, 
however, also as far as I can discover almost absent, its sole ex- 
ponent being the widely distributed and common little D. globosus. 
Suitable habitats both on the coast and in the estuaries are still 
perhaps awaiting investigation. 
fOXYTELUS PERRISI Fauv. (MARITIMUS Thoms.). In spring and autumn 
at Tregantle. First taken there by Mr. J. J. Walker. In May, 1902, 
the var. with testaceous elytra occurred in some numbers. Dawlish, 
de la Garde. 
*O. COMPLANATUS Pand. Batten, Millbrook, ete. 
{TROoGOPHL@US HALOPHILUS Kies. Millbrook Creek, two only, May, 
1900; in June, on the South Down side, in numbers; July, 1916, 
several between lamelle of slate on the shore, creek at Brixton. 
+T. uNIcoLor Shp. (ANGLICANUS Shp.). This species was extra-Huropean, 
being known from New Zealand only, until I found the first speci- 
men under a stone at about half-tide near Palmer’s Point, Millbrook 
Creek ; after much search my second example was found on the 
opposite bank of the creek, near South Down, in a similar situation. 
In July Dr. M. Cameron, B.N., captured two specimens in the roll 
of seaweed at high tide near my original locality, and in August we 
together took 17 specimens in the seaweed. The insect has persisted 
in the locality to the present time, occurring frequently in consider- 
able numbers ; in July, 1905, for example, it was swarming, and 
I secured 180 specimens in an hour and a half! My second speci- 
men, noted above, cost me 40 hours’ work grubbing for it ! 
There was considerable difference of opinion amongst authorities 
as to the probable origin of this Staphylinid in England. M. Fauvel 
held that the species was identical with that from N.Z. Dr. D. Sharp 
inclined to the “ opposite opinion, and to the conclusion that we have 
here to do with two species almost identical in structure and general 
character, produced independently in the two antipodes of the 
world, but under very similar conditions.” He also stated: “ As, 
however, 7’. anglicanus belongs to one of the most neglected and un- 
attractive groups of Coleoptera, I shall not be surprised to hear of 
