622 E. J. ALLEN. 



combe Estuary. On all grounds except finest mud (Joum. M.B.A., 

 vol. 6, 1900, p. 193). 



ExMOUTH. Common in sand and muddy sand all over the 



estuary (Joum. M.B.A., vol. 6, 1902, p. 319). 



Toe QUAY. Common in sand at Tor Abbey Sands and Livermead. 

 In dirty, muddy sand in the inner harbour of Torquay (Elwes, Joum. 

 M.B.A., vol. 8, 1909, p. 350). 



Nephthys cirrosa Ehlers : Mcintosh, Mon. Brit. Ann. II. 1, 1908, 

 p. 36. 



PLYMOtTTH. In sand between tide-marks, Drake's Island and 

 Yealm Estuary. 



ExMOUTH. In considerable numbers on grounds where the 

 soil was fine clean sand, but did not occur in any other localities 

 (Joum. M.B.A., vol. 6, 1902, p. 319). 



Torquay. In clean sand in company with N. Homhergi, but 



not quite so numerous (Elwes, Joum. M.B.A., vol. 8, 1909, p. 350). 



EUNICID^. 



Staurocephalus rubrovittatus Grube : Mcintosh, Mon. Brit. Ann. 

 II. 2, 1910, p. 353. 



Plymouth. Frequent in dredgings from Millbay Channel, 

 Queen's Ground, Asia Shoal, Duke Eock. Also taken 2 miles of? 

 Yealm Head. 



Torquay. One specimen at an unusually low spring tide at 



Corbyn's Head {Ehves, Joum. M.B.A., vol. 9, 1910, p. 61). 



Staurocephalus ciliatus (Keferstein) : Ehlers, Borstenwiirmer, 1868, 

 p. 424. 



Plymouth. Recorded once from Queen's Ground dredging. 

 No further specimens have been obtained since the one entered 

 in the former list. The specimen has four eyes, an anterior pair of 

 large eyes and a posterior pair of small ones, as described by Ehlers 

 and Keferstein. In this respect it difters from the S. ciliatus of 

 Mcintosh (Mon. Brit. Ann. II. 2, 1910, p. 359), which is described as 

 having two eyes, black, large and distinct. 



Staurocephalus pallidus Langerhans : Zeit. wiss. Zool. XXXIII. 

 1879, p. 300. Mcintosh, Mon. Brit. Ami. II. 2, 1910, p. 362 and 

 p. 363. 



Plymouth. Recorded once from Asia Shoal dredging. In the 

 former list it was stated that the species " resembles S. ciliatus Kef., 

 excepting for absence of eyes." This should have read " excepting 

 for the absence of the posterior pair of eyes." The specimen, as 

 Mcintosh [I.e. p. 362) who examined it points out, has two very 

 distinct eyes situated near the base of the tentacles. As regards the 



