349 
concludes his note more carefully by say- 
e plant as a distinct species (from 
coveries to prove or disprove 
Mr. Brown’s critical 
. Mr. ] rown, however, 
ve : I have maintained th 
- glabra, Decsne.), leaving future dis 
is view ow 
oe of an asclepia 
of ig a little east of Prince Albert and belong to t 
‘. oe Wittebergen series. The plant appeared to me to answer 
e description of Fochea capensis, Endl., but my attempts to 
ey the help of some friends, to 
h om I sent photographs of the plant, remained fruitless until now ; 
ence I did not venture to publish my observation, This year, 
