REPORT OF COMMISSIONER OF FISH AND FISHEEIES. [222] 
horny, well developed, as long as the mantle. One of the ventral arms 
is usually hectocotylized in the male. Arms with suckers, or with 
claws, or with both. 
Family TEUTHIDH3 Owen (restricted). (See pp. [69], [75].) 
For a brief synopsis of the previously known genera of this family, 
see pp. [69-70]. 
Enoploteuthis. (See pp. [70], [203].) 
Enoploteuthis Hartingii Verrill. (Pp. [53], [203].) 
Enoploteuthis Cookii Owen = E. Molince D’Orb. (Pp. [53], [203].) 
Moeoteuthis Verrill. (See pp. [70], [209].) 
Moroteuthis robusta (Dali) Verrill. (Pp. [65], [209].) 
' Gonatus Gray. (See pp. [204], [206].) 
Gonatus amcenus Gray. (Pp. [204], [206].) 
Lestoteuthis Verrill (See pp. [70], [76], [78], [204], [205].) 
1. Lestoteuthis Fabricii (Licht.) Verrill. (Pp. [76], [79], [206].) 
Family OMMASTREPHID.E. (See pp. [80], [201].) 
Ommastrephes. (See pp. [81-83], [202].) 
Ommastrephes (pars) D’Orbigny, Voy. Am. M6rid., 1835; C^phal. Ac6tab., p. 341. 
I Ilex and Todarode s Steenstrnp, Oversigt k. Danske Vidensk. Selsk. Forhand., 
1880, p. 90. 
2. Ommastrephes illecebrosus (Les.) Verrill. (Pp. [83], [202].) 
Sthenoteuthis Verrill. (See pp. [99], [201].) 
3. Sthenoteuthis megaptera Verrill. (P. [100].) 
Sthenoteuthis pteropus (Steenst.) Verrill. (Pp. [103], [107], [202].) 
4. Sthenoteuthis Bartramii (Les.) Verrill. (P. [112].) 
Architeuthis (Steenst.) Harting, 1881. (See pp. [1-20], [23], [51-65], 
[114], [199].) 
Architeuthus Steenst., 1856 (no description). 
5. Architeuthis Harveyi Verrill. (Pp. [23-40], [114], [200-201], [219].) 
6. Architeuthis princeps Verrill. (Pp. [41-50], [114].) 
Architeuthis monachus (Steenst.). (Pp. [24], [51-62].) 
Architeuthis dux (Steenst.) Gervais. (Pp. [24], [51], [200].) 
Architeuthis Hartingii Verrill. (Pp. [53], [200].) 
Architeuthis Bouyeri Verrill. (Pp. [54-57].) 
Architeuthis (?) Mouchezi Velain. (Pp. [63-65].) 
Architeuthis grandis (Owen) Verrill. (Pp. [57-59], [200].) 
The number of the foreign species, mostly nominal and imperfectly 
known, will undoubtedly be much reduced when they become better 
known. Probably A. dux and A. Bouyeri are identical, but there is as 
yet no proper zoological description of either. The former has been 
very briefly described by Gervais, and Harting has published an out¬ 
line figure of one of the mandibles. 
