458 



DAVID H. DOLLEY 



Yet one animal was in shock, and one was double the size of 

 the other. It is true there are only five examples but it was 

 felt at the beginning of this final test that to obtain even one 

 successful result would be conclusive, and more than that, two 

 of the five cells — eleven (figure 1) and fifteen — are so peculiar 

 and atypical in their shape, though corresponding in other respects 

 to the resting type that no test could be more rigorous. The most 

 convincing point in the wax reconstruction was that so far as 

 one could judge the possibility of a closer approximation to 

 exactness in any cell than was ventured, it would have tended to 

 lessen the deviation from a constant mean. 



TABLE 2 

 Weights and nucleus-plasma coefficients of wax models 



NUMBER OF EXPERI- 

 MfiNT 



NUMBER or 

 CELL 



THICKNESS 



OF- WAX 



PLATE IN 



MM. 



WEIGHT OF 

 MAGNIFI- j WAX 



CATION j PLASMA (N 

 GRAMS 



WEIGHT OF 

 WAX 



NUCLEUS 



NUCLEUB- 

 PLABMA 

 COEFFI- 

 CIENT 



Experiment Shock 

 37 



Experiment Nor- 

 mal 19 



After two-micra serials 



2 

 3 

 4 



4 (repeated) 

 5 

 6 

 7 



After one-micron serials 



9 

 10 

 11 

 16 



After two-micra serials 



15 



2.560 



2560 



48.30 4.31 



11 320 

 10.932 

 12.706 

 11.607 

 11.723 

 10.610 

 11.599 

 10.741 



11.013 

 11.401 

 11.221 

 10.804 



11.206 



