m mi INDIAN USUI RY 



KO<yi1NOTES 



1 tiilksan-C'arncr I rihaK'ouncil. Eixhibil #52, p. 10. 



2 fhc lerm "Indian tVxxJ fishcrv" is cnliti/ed hy many Indians on 

 the grimnds thai il implies a (radituma! dependence on lish for 

 direct consumption only. Fish have histoncully been important 

 commodities ol trade and barter as well. 



.1. Wil.wn Duff. Indian History of British Columbia . Anthropology in 

 British Columbia Memoir No. 5, Victoria, 1964. Vol. 1. p. 39. 



4 C'l.W Hewes. Indian Tishenes Prixluctivity in Pre-contact Times in 

 the Pacific S;ilmon Area, Northwest Anthropological Research 

 Notes . Volume 7, 1973. 



5. Hewes. Indian Fisheries Productivity. 



6. The Native Brotherhood of British Columbia, Exhibit #14la,p.iv. 



7. W. McKay. "The Native Fixxi Fishery and the Potential Impacts 

 of Oil Spills." A report prepared for the West Coast Oil Ports 

 Inquiry. 1978. 



8. Because of the lack of a consistent system of data collection, 

 catches and trends are very uncertain. Some of the increase sug- 

 gested by these figures may be due simply to improvements in 

 reporting. The figures cited were provided in Department of Fish- 

 eries and Oceans, Exhibit # 167. 



9. Marilyn G. Bennett. "Indian Fishing and its Cultural Importance 

 in the Eraser River System." A report prepared for the Union of 

 B.C. Indian Chiefs and the Fisheries and Marine Service, 1972. 



10. W.F. Sinclair. "The Economic and Social Impact of the Kemano II 

 Hydroelectric Project on British Columbia Fishenes Resources, 

 (Vol.11)." A report prepared for the Fisheries and Marine Service, 

 1976. 



11. Edwin, Reid and Associates Ltd., "Working Paper on Indian Food 

 Fisheries and Salmonid Enhancement." A report prepared for the 

 Department of Fishenes and Oceans, 1979. 



12. Sinclair, "The Economic and Social Impact of the Kemano II." 



13. Nishga Tribal Council, Exhibit #129, p. 4. 



14. Edwin, Reid and Associates Ltd., "Working Paper on Indian Food 

 Fisheries." 



15. Reuben M. Ware. "Five Issues Five Battlegrounds - An Introduc- 

 tion to the History of Indian Fishing in Bnlish Columbia 1850- 

 1930." Prepared for Coqualeetza Educational Traimng Centre, 

 1978. p. 14. 



16. Bntish Columbia Fisheries Regulations, November 26, 1888. 



17. Revised Statues of Canada 1970, Appendix II, No. 10. 



18. Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs, Exhibit #133, p. 2,4. 



19. Squamish Indian Band, Flxhibit # 106, Part 111, p. 2. 



20. Exhibit #167, p. 1. 



21. Exhibit #52, p. 26-27, 



22. Exhibit #133, p. 18. 



23. Exhibit #133, p. 24. 



24. Nicola Valley Area Council, Supplementary Document #S-IO. 



25. See Robert B. Lane and Barbara Lane, "Union of British Colum- 

 bia Indian Chiefs Fishing Portfolio." 1978. 



26. Lane and Lane, "Umon of British Columbia Indian Chiefs Fishing 

 Portfolio." 



27. The Supreme Court of Canada has acknowledged that such legisla- 

 tion could impinge on previously guaranteed treaty rights in R. v. 

 Sikyea , [1964] 2 Canadian Criminal Cases 325; Affirmed [1964] 

 Supreme Court Reports 642, [1965] 2 Canadian Criminal Ca.ses 

 129, 50 Dominion Law Reports (2d) 8. 



28. R. v. Cooper , ( 1968) I Dominion Law Reports (3d) 1 18. 



29. C.A.G. Palmer, "The Unilateral Abrogation of Indian and Eskimo 

 Treaty Rights", 47 Cnrrunal Reports 395. 



30. Calder et al v. A.G.B.C , 74 Western Weekly Reports 481, 13 

 Dominion Law Reports (3d) 64 (B.C. Court of Appeal). 



31. Calder et al v. A.G.B.C , [1973] Supreme Court Reports 313, [1973] 

 4 Western Weekly Reports 1, 34 Dominion Law Reports (3d) 145 

 (Supreme Court of Canada). 



32. Demksan v. The Queen , [1976] 6 Western Weekly Reports 480 

 (Supreme Court of Canada). 



33. Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Canada Act . 



34. See Revised Statutes of Canada 1970, Appendix II, No. 10, Sched- 

 ule, Article 13. 



35. Jack et al v. The Queen , 100 Dominion Law Reports (3d) 193 

 (Supreme Court of Canada). In a dissenting judgment, Mr. Justice 

 Dickson stated that the Indian fishenes should be accorded a prior- 

 ity second only to conservation needs. 



36. Indian Act . Revised Statutes of Canada 1970 chapter 1-6, sections 

 8l(o),82, 



37. Annual Report . Department of Indian Affairs, 1876, p. 32. 



38. See The Nimpkish Band Council, Exhibit #156; and The Native 

 Brotherhood of British Columbia Exhibit #198. 



