CTENOPHORA. 77 



figure given of the latter by A. G. Mayer') is, as regards the colour, not in accordance with the 

 description of Agassiz. 



The Mediterranean species, Bolina liydatina Chun, is stated to differ from B. infundibuhim, 

 besides in the less developed windings of the lobe-vessels and some other minor characters, in the remark- 

 able fact that the subventral vessels precede the snbtentacular ones in the course of the develop- 

 ment from the young to the adult form, while in B. infundibulum (alata) it is exactly the reverse 

 according to Agassiz. With full reason Chun points out (Dissogonie, p. 93) that "es ist im hohen 

 Maasse auffallig, dass bei nahe verwandten Arten so bemerkenswerthe Differenzen in deni Gauge der 

 postembryonalen Entwicklung obwalten". Though the figures given by Agassiz show this very 

 clearly, I think we may desire to see this statement verified by renewed researches. The fig. 8 

 especially does not appear to me very convincing, and I may call attention to the fact that in the 

 much more advanced stage represented in his fig. 12 the snbtentacular vessels are represented 

 as ending at the sides of the lobes, not uniting in the middle, and not distinctly in advance of the 

 subventral vessels. Also the facts pointed out above in regard to his figures of young Mertensia oviii/i 

 make me hesitate in accepting as beyond doubt the statements and figures of the development of Bolina. 



There would, however, appear to exist another very conspicuous difference between the young 

 of B. infundibulum and hydatina. In the young specimen of ca. i""" diameter represented by Vogt 

 & Yung (Op. cit. p. 175 — 176) in figs. 75 — 76 the tentacular vessel is represented issuing from one of the 

 interradial vessels, not occupying the middle between the two iuterradial vessels. I have had occasion 

 to convince myself of the correctness of this observation (on a specimen of 1-5"'"' diameter). Judging 

 from Taf. IX, fig. 3 of Chun's memoir "Die Dissogonie", this would not appear to be the case in 

 B. hydatina ; but no quite corresponding stage being figured by Chun, the existence of this difference 

 cannot be regarded as beyond doubt. 



If these differences in the development of B. hydatina and infundibulum prove to be sure facts, 

 there will, of course, be no doubt possible that they are reallj- two different species. But until then 

 I cannot feel very convinced of the specific difference between the two forms. The length of the 

 auricles and of the costa; are not reliable characters; I have observed a rather considerable variation 

 therein in B. infundibulum. The only difference of somewhat more value, which I can find between 

 hydatina and infundibulum is in the windings of the lobe-vessels. Judging from the fig. i, p. 82 of Chun's 

 memoir "Die Dissogonie", which represents a specimen of ca. 9'" height, these windings are decidedly less 

 developed than in infundibuluin ; even though a not inconsiderable variation obtains in regard to the 

 development of the windings in B. infundibulum, I have never observed them so little developed in the latter. 



The question about the specific value of Bolina hydatina luust then be left undecided for the 

 present. Judging, however, from the fact shown above that the Mediterranean Pleurobrachia rhodopis 

 cannot be distinguished from PI. pileus, and from the fact shown below, that the Mediterranean 

 Beroc otiata can, at most, be regarded as a variety of Beroe cucumis, it will probably be conceded that 

 the conclusion lies near at hand that also Bolina hydatina, only found in the Mediterranean, is only a 



I) A. G. Mayer. Some Medusae from the Tortugas, Florida. Bull. Mus Comp. Zool. Vol. 37. 1900. PI. 27. Figs. 91 -92. 

 Moser (Japanische Ctenophoren, p. 53) supposes that the rosy colour of the specimen figured by Mayer "mit der natur- 

 lichen Farbe uichts zu tun hat, da Agassiz ausdriickUch die Farblosigkeit hervorhebt und Mayer sonst wohl vou einer 

 Identifikation beider Abstand genommen hatte". This point might well deserve an authentic explanation. 



