962 WILLIAM A. LOCY 
descriptions of Arabian and classical writers, and transferred to 
paper. The sketches are certainly schematic and show the in- 
fluence of tradition but they were not produced by Peyligk. The | 
speculation of, Stockton-Hough that they came from an illustra- 
ted Mundinus of 1498 is unfounded. There is no known illus- 
trated Mundinus of 1498 and the suggestion is probably due to a 
confusion of the Mundinus text in Ketham’s Fasciculus of 1495. 
Several of the sketches are now traceable to the diagrams of Henri 
de Mondeville, and used by him about 1304 in illustrating his 
anatomical lectures at Montpellier. Pagel made known in 1889 
that de Mondeville had employed sketches and, in 1890, Nicaise 
reproduced the miniature sketches of entire figures showing inter- 
nal anatomy. He says that de Mondeville also made use of 
sketches of separate organs of which all trace had been lost. 
These separate sketches have now been unearthed and were 
published in 1908 by Weindler, and, in a separate article, by Sud- 
hoff. Those reproduced by Sudhoff embrace eighteen manu- 
script figures, nos. 1 to 7 found in the Royal Library at Berlin 
and nos. 8 to 18 in the Royal Library at Erfurt. The resemblance 
of some of the figures of Peyligk to these manuscript sketches 
of de Mondeville, leaves room for no reasonable doubt that the 
latter were the sources from which the Peyligk figures were drawn. 
It is uncertain how the pictures of de Mondeville originated. 
Sudhoff suggests that possibly de Mondeville began illustrating 
his earliest lectures at Montpellier by making diagrams of tradi- 
tional anatomical sketches. Of thiswehave no certain knowledge, 
but we have, at’ any rate, the sketches of separate organs of de 
Mondeville to add to his miniature pictures of entire anatomical 
figures that were previously known. 
Hundt. The next printed anatomical illustrations to come 
under notice are those of Magnus Hundt, a Leipzig anatomist. 
His Antropologium de hominis dignitate, ete., published in 1501, 
is a rare quarto of 120 leaves, with a letter-press 3+ x 5? inches. : 
It contains nineteen illustrations, one of which is printed twice. 
The sketch of the viscera in situ is shown in fig. 9. There is 
another large figure in the book (the one that is repeated) showing 
the ventricles and the general location of physiological function 
