472 Oren E. Frazee 
TABLE XI 
Table showing two measurements of regenerated lengths in both sets, arranged in order of amount and the 
totals and averages 
mM! M? 
Non-stim. | Stim. | Non-stim. | Stim. 
0.25 | 0.38 1.0 | Hil 
0.25 | 0.4 1.0 | ie 
0.25 | 0.4 12 1067) 
0.3 0.4 Dez | oe 
0.3 | 0.4 seas) teal 
0.3 0.4 168) 1.4 
0.3 0.4 1s) 1.4 
0.35 |) vona2 Ing | Tos 
0.35 0.45 15} | Mat 
0.35 0.45 1.4 iol 
0.35 0.45 1.4 15 
0.38 0.45 1.4 Tei 
0.4 0.45 1.4 Te 
0.4 0.45 1.4 1.6 
0.4 0.45 1.4 1.6 
0.4 0.5 1.4 1.6 
0.4 0.5 Hol 1.6 
O.51 aly 1.6 
6.13 | 7.86 | 226 25.9 
Av 34+ 43+ 1-30-f 1.43 + 
An examination of these results shows: 
1 That two days after stimulation each individual of the 
stimulated set had regenerated on the average 0.09 mm., or 26 + 
per cent more than the members of the non-stimulated set. See 
Tables X and XI, measurement number one. 
2 That four days after stimulation each individual of the 
stimulated set had regenerated on the average 0.12 + mm., or 
9 + per cent more than the members of the non-stimulated set. 
See Tables X and XI, measurement number two. | 
