Oulactis foliosa Andres, 1883. 

 Asteractis conquilega Verrill, 180'.). 

 Asteractis sp? Duerden, 1898. 

 Asteractis expansa Duerden, 1902. 

 A. radiata (Duch. Mich.) 

 Synon: Oulactis radiata Duch. and Mich. 1860, 1864. 

 Lophactis radiata Andres, 1883. 



Fam. DENDROMBLIDAE. 



Genus Lebrunia Duch. Mich. 



Synon: Lebrunia Duch. and Mich., 1860, 1864. 



Actinodactylus (pars) Duch. and Mich., 1860, 1864. 

 Stauractis (pars) Andres, 1883. 

 Oulactis (pars) Duch. and Mich., 1800. 

 Rhodactis Duch. and Mich., 1864. 

 Hoplophoria H. V. Wilson, 1890. 

 This generic terni is employed with some hesitation since it seems 

 exceedingly probable that it is identica! with Actinodactylus proposed 

 by Duchassaing in 1850. 1 am quite in agreement with Verrill (1899) 

 that A. neglectus 'Duch. and Mieli., 1800) is the young of L. negtecla ; 

 indeed, apart from the similarities shown by the descriptions, the 

 identity of the specillo names seems to indicate that originally the 

 authors were inclined to regard the two forms as identical, but sepa- 

 rated them on second thoughts. As regards A. boseii, which is the 

 type of its ^enus, the case is not so clear, and while the presumption 

 is strongly in favor of its belongiug to the sanie genus as L. neglecta, 

 the uncertainty renders it advisable to hesitate before defìnitely 

 assuming the identity. 



L. neglecta Duch. Mich. 

 Synon: Lebrunia neglecta Duch. and Mich., 1860. 



Actinodactylus neglectus Duch. and Mieli., 1860. 

 Stauractis incerta Andres, 1883. 

 Oulactis Danae Duch. and Mich., 1864. 

 Taractea Danae Andres, 1883. 

 ? Rhodactis musciformis Duch. and Mich., 1864. 

 Of this speeies l 'found in the Turili collection a single specimen, 

 with which there was but one label, presumably by Duchassaing, 

 which read Oulactis Danae. The generic terni had been crossed out, 

 however, by a later hand and Lebrunia written above it. 



The specimen was of about the sanie size as the L. neglecta which 

 1 described in 1881), and in its internai structure, so far as sections 



