6 
PSYCHE 
[February 
not plumose ; abdomen broad and dullish, with numerous distinct piliferous 
punctures, but not otherwise punctate ; caudal fimbria dull black. 
By the obliquely truncate apical joint of antenna?, and characters of legs, 
this is a veritable MelUta { = CUissa)\ by the dark caudal fringe it is allied to 
AT. leporina, but it is not that species. It was described vaguely from the 
“ United States,” but Mr. Lovell informs me that he has taken it at Waldoboro, 
Maine. 
.And ret! a conun ml a (Smith). 
9. K.xpanse of wings about 21 mm.; facial fovea; quite broad, whitish, 
clypeus closely punctured, with a strong median ridge ; tubercle on labrum large 
and quite broadly rounded, not nearly so pointed as Morice’s account suggested ; 
eye not separated from fovea by more than the usual narrow line ; mesothorax 
minutely roughened, with small shallow punctures: mesothoracic area not dis- 
tinctly defined, only minutely plicate basally ; tibial scopa fulvo-ferruginous, not 
plumose ; basal joint of hind tarsi broad, red, with ferruginous hair on inner 
side ; abdomen not hairy as in sayl, having only piliferous punctures ( but these 
very distinct ), and not fasciate ; fimbria a fine orange-fulvous. I noted that it 
suggested .4. corni, Rob., and later Mr. Viereck sent me a specimen of conii to 
compare, and I found no difference. 
.4/iilrena Integra, .Smith. 
9 . In Robertson’s tables this runs to 1 1 , and then runs out, because of 
unhanded abdomen and eye not widely separated from fovea. Compared with 
a species from Pennsylvania sent by Mr. Viereck, and supposed to be Integra, the 
type was found to be a smaller and very different species, without abdominal 
hair-bands, and with the fimbria strong light ferruginous. It has strongly- 
marked, yellowish-white, narroev facial fovem, adjacent to the eyes ; clypeus 
microscopically tessellate, with scattered and shallow but distinct punctures; 
scutellum very shiny, its disc wholly impunctate ; wings yellowish, stigma dark 
ferruginous. 
Upon learning that the supposed Integra was not that species, Mr. Viereck 
sent A. lineata, Prov., suggesting that this was the real integra. Careful com- 
parisons showed that they were identical. 
Andrcna snbtilis. Smith. 
9 . Vancouver 1. (Lyall). Supposed sufit/V/s, sent by Mr. Viereck, was a 
much smaller and very different species. The real si/btilis is a large, handsome 
