182 A. E. Verrill—North American Cephalopods. 
St. John’s, Newfoundland. It was photographed, and cuts copied 
from the photograph were published in some of the English maga- 
zines.* Before it was secured for preservation it had been consider. 
ably injured, many of the larger suckers having been torn off or 
mutilated. Owing to this fact they were originally described by Mr. 
Harvey as destitute of marginal denticulations, but he subsequently 
reéxamined the specimen, at my request, and informed me that they 
were all originally denticulated. Of this specimen I have seen only the 
photograph and some of the smaller suckers. This fragment represents 
the distal half of one of the long tentacular-arms, with its expanded ter- 
minal portion or “club,” originally covered with cup-shaped suckers, 
about 24 of which, forming two central rows, are very large, the largest 
being 1:25 inches in diameter; others, alternating with these along 
each margin, are smaller, with the edge supported by a serrated ring. 
The tip of the arm is covered with numerous smaller suckers, in four 
rows. The part of the arm preserved measured, when fresh, 19 feet 
in length, and 3°5 inches in circumference, but wider, “like an oar,” 
and 6 inches in circumference, near the end, where the suckers are 
situated. 
It is stated that six feet of this arm had been destroyed before it 
was preserved, and the captors estimated that they left from six to 
ten feet attached to the creature, which would make the total length 
between 31 and 35 feet. According to Mr. Murray, the portion pre- 
served measured but 17 feet in length, when he examined it, Oct. 
31, 1873, after it had been a few days in strong brine. The other arm 
was destroyed and no description was made; but the portion secured 
was estimated by the fishermen to have been 6 feet long and 10 
inches in diameter; it was evidently one of the eight shorter sessile 
arms, and its size was probably overestimated. The fishermen esti- 
mated the body of this individual to have been about 60 feet in length 
and 5 feet in diameter; but if the proportions be about the same as 
in the specimens since captured, (No. 5 and No. 14), as I believe, 
then the body could not have been more than about 10 feet long, and 
2°5 feet in diameter, and the long arms should have been about 32 
feet in length.t Allowing two fect for the head, the total length 
would, therefore, be about 44 feet. 
* See Annals and Magazine of Natural History, IV, xiii, p. 68, Jan., 1874; and 
“The Field,” Dee. 13, 1873. The central line of this photograph is reduced four and 
a quarter times, while the front part is reduced about four times. 
+ Doubtless these long arms are very contractile, and changeable in length, like 
those of the ordinary squids, 
