228 SMITH: STUDIES IN THE GENUS LUPINUS 
1904, H. M. Hall 4045 (B, UC); same locality, May, 1907, 
F. M. Reed 1332 (B); San Jacinto, 1890, Mrs. Gregory (UC). 
San Bernardino County: Colorado Desert, April, 1889, C. R: 
Orcutt (US); San Bernardino, June, 1876, J. G. Lemmon (DS); 
San Bernardino Mountains, May, Clara E. Cummings (G); same 
locality, May, 1880, G. R. Vasey 95 (US);. same locality, June, 
1888, S. B. Parish (UC); same locality, Fredalba, July, 1908, 
H. M. Hall 8942 (NY, US); same locality, Grass Valley, June, 
1894, S. B. Parish 3055 (Type, US 214651); same locality, 
Hunsacker Flat, June, 1916, H. P. Chandler 9 (UC); same locality, 
south slope, March, 1906, S. B. Parish 5761 (B, RM); Mojave 
River headwaters, May, 1881, S. B. & W. F. Parish 94 (T); 
Victorville, April, 1919, P. A. Munz 2590 (DS). San Diego 
County: Cuyamaca, July, 1906, K. Brandegee (UC); Descanso, 
May, 1906, 7. S. Brandegee (NY, UC); Jacumba, April, 1905, 
T. S. Brandegee (UC); Santa Ysabel, April, 1893, H. W. Henshaw 
1go (US); Warner’s ranch, May, 1899, H. M. Hall 1373 (UC); 
Witch Creek, May, 1894, R. D. Alderson (UC). County not 
determined: San Emigdio Canyon, May, 1896, J. B. Davy 2061 
(UC); 1876, Parry & Lemmon 64 (G, T); Dr. Coulter (T); H. P. 
Chandler 1498 (UC); S. B. Parish (US 136782); 1889, C. R- 
Orcutt (US 40870, left-hand specimen only). 
2d. Lupinus concinnus Agardhianus (Heller) comb. nov. [Fic. 71.-] 
Lupinus gracilis Agardh, Syn. Gen. Lup. 15. pl. 1, f. 2. 1835. 
Lupinus Agardhianus Heller, 
Muhlenbergia 7: 13. I 
Differs from the Rae L. 
concinnus in being usually more 
slender, less branched, and of open 
habit; petals edged with rose-pur- 
ple or sometimes bright blue; pub- 
escence spreading, but much less 
dense; banner usually acute at 
apex. 
Agardh’s plate and description 
Fic. 71. concinnus Seem to abundantly warrant the 
AGARDHTANUS Gietier) *o. P. — 
1H. M, Hall 3862 (US): 2 C.R usual determinations here accepted 
Orcutt ge 40870, gnee hand specimen) by me. 
