230 SMITH: STUDIES IN THE GENUS LUPINUS 
CALIFORNIA. San Diego County: Mountain Springs, April, 
1889,C. R. Orcutt (US) ; same 
2, Met locality, May, 1894, L. Schoem- 
a feldt, Int. Bound. Comm. 3065 
(US); San Diego, May, 1906, 
5 T. S. Brandegee (B); San 
SS; Wy ae Filipe, April, 1895, 7. S. 
a, Brandegee (UC); Sea Beach, 
<< : a) April, 1882, C. G. Pringle 
{ . ' (T,US) ;Tia Juana, May,1903, 
se ox ‘ L. R. Abrams 3487 (DS, NY). 
: LowWER CALIFORNIA. San 
: iicm. ROY Vincente, June, 1893, 7. S. 
a Brandegee (US); northern 
; (Brandegee) - PF Sm 
326 (US); Cc 
mer “Or (US Lower California, April, 1886, 
: cas 21035); 
ee Se hoemfelds, I.B.C. 3065 (US) si C. R. Orcutt 1326 ey US). 
72. LUPINUS are eve PALLIDUS 
Be SEAS oh 
~£ 
2f. Lupinus concinnus desertorum (Heller) comb. nov. [Fic. 73. 
Lupinus desertorum Heller, Muhlen- 
bergia 2:72. 1905. 
Differs from var. pallidus in the 
number and shape of the leaflets which 
are six to nine, oblong-lanceolate, angled 
at apex. 
CALIFORNIA. Kern County: Ran- 
_ dsburg, April, 1905, A. A. Heller 76709 
(B; DS, UC, US). San Bernardino 
County: Ord Mountains, May, 1906, Se 
Hall & Chandler 6792 in part* (B, UC). . 73. Lupinus CON- 
he ee ry 
ler) Cc. P. Sm 
SUBCARNOSI Heller 
3. Lupinus suspcarNosus Hook. Bot. Mag. 10: pl. 34067. 1836. 
[Fic. 74.] 
Lupinus texensis Hook. Ibid. to: pl. 3492. 1836. 
Lupinus bimaculatus Hook.; Don, Sweet’s Brit. Fl. Gard. II. 4: 
pl. 314. 1838. 
t 
* The other specimen on this sheet is cited as typical L. concinnus. 
