GLEANINGS FROM THE ASSIZE KOLI.S FOR DERIJVSHIRE. lOl 



Consent having been given, Hanselin took possession 

 witliout further seisin, and placed Prutefot therein to work 

 it for their mutual benefit. Poor Maurice having recovered, 

 found himself without his mill, and apparently without his 

 [)romised benefit, and appealed to the justices of assize 

 against his unjust dissiesure. The result is not recorded, 

 but the record closes with the questions " Whether Ansehn 

 was chief lord of the fee," and " Whether Maurice could 

 legally assume his former rights." Maurice was enfeoffed 

 of the mill by Hugo de Mersinton. 



WHITTINGTON MOOR. 



Margery, relict of John de Newbold, accused Robert 

 the son of Geoffry Dethic and Elena his wife, with Geoffry 

 Dethic, Geoffry le Soriant, Will, de Essoure, Ric, son of 

 Ralph de Wytinton, Adam Balle, John son of Matilda) 

 Robert his son, John Penke, Hugh son of Rob. de 

 Whittington, and Hen. le Ford, of having unjustly dissiesed 

 her of her common pasture in Whittington Moor. Geoffry 

 de Dethic responded for himself and others that he had 

 no claim in the s'' moor, nor yet in the name of the said 

 Ellen wife of his son Robert, who was under age and in 

 the custody of her grandfather. (Her subsequent guardians 

 were Ralph de Cocu (? Curzon) and Phil, de Colen.) The 

 charge was unfounded, and Margaret was fined for false 

 clamour. 



BREADSALL. {Roll 146. L. 3) 



Geoffry de Dethic entered an action against Henry le 

 Curzon, Richard le Curzon, Geoffry le Provost, Geoff. 

 Fitzalan, Will., son of Rob. le Provost, and Rob. le 

 Charreter for unjustly dissiesing him of one messuage and 

 46 acres of land in Breadsall. None of the accused 

 appeared besides Henry Curzon, and the assize proceeded 

 against them by default. 



Henry Curzon said that Hugo de Dun at one time enfeoffed 

 him and Johanna, his wife, conjointly, of the s'' tenement, 

 ^:c., and that afterwards, in the 53rd year of Hen. HI., 



