10) 
11) 
12) 
13) 
14) 
15) 
1882. 
1882. 
1883. 
1885. 
1885. 
1885. 
505 
sion, Vol. 1 for 1881, ersch. 1882, p. 22, 23: — „Kuprrer’s 
vesicle, has not yet been proved to be an allantois, as was 
at first supposed, but is almost certainly a result of the 
invagination of the gastrula mouth or blastopore at the tail. 
The canal passing from it may be called Kurrrer’s canal 
and opens on the dorsal face of the embryo.“ 
Ryper, JoHn A., Development of the Spanish Mackerel 
(Cybium maculatum). Bulletin of the United States Fish 
Commission, Vol 1, for 1881, ersch. 1882, p. 135—173, 
4 Taf. Erörtert hier Barrour’s Anschauung, hat jedoch für 
diese Anschauung kein Verständnis, erklärt dann „I am at 
a loss to clearly understand its (sc. der K. B.) significance“ 
und verspricht, die Erörterung darüber später wieder auf- 
zunehmen. 
Zincuer, H. E, Die embryonale Entwickelung von Salmo 
salar. Inaugural-Dissertation, Freiburg i. B. 1882, 64 pp., 
4 Taf.: — p. 50, „es ist einleuchtend, anzunehmen, daß 
BL und daß sie (sc. die K. B.) der Erweiterung des 
Schwanzdarms homolog ist, welche Banrour bei den Sela- 
chiern an dieser Stelle beobachtet hat.“ 
Kinestry, J. S., and Cony, H., W., Some Observations on 
the Embryology of the Teleosts. Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. 
Hist., Vol. 3, p. 183—212, Taf. 14—16, p. 208. Kritisirt 
die 1880 von HEnnueGuy gegebene Vergleichung, „a view, 
which it seems to me is entirely unwarranted by the 
previous growth of the embryo and by the method of 
origin and position of the vesicle as we have seen it. The 
view of BALFOUR seems much more probable. 
Henxeevy, F., Sur la ligne primitive des Poissons osseux. 
Zool. Anz., Jahrg. 8, p. 103—108. — p. 107: „La vesicule 
de Kuprrer est, en effet, le premier vestige de l’intestin 
postérieur et en suivant son &volution, on la voi s’ étendre 
en avant et devenir la partie posterieure du tube digestif.“ 
Agassiz, ALEXANDER, and WuirTman, C. O. On the Deve- 
lopment of some Pelagic Fish Eggs. Preliminary Notice. 
Proceed. Amer. Acad. Art. and Sciences, New Ser., Vol. 12, 
p. 23—75, 1 Taf. — p. 71: „The history of the vesicle 
(sc. K. B.) is, in many respects, so entirely different from 
that of the ,,caudal vesicle“ of the elasmobranch embryo 
that we do not feel ready to accept this interpretation. 
The interpretations which have been offered by Kuprrrr 
and Hrnnecouy are still more unsatisfactory.“ 
Cunnincuam, J. T., The Significance of Kurrrer’s Vesicle, 
with Remarks on other Questions of Vertebrate Morpho- 
logy. Quarterly Journ. Micr. Sc., New. Ser., Vol. 25, p. 1—14, 
Taf. 1. — p. 6: „Kuprrer’s vesicle in the Teleostean is the 
homologue of the cavity of invagination in the Elasmo- 
branch und Amphibians, it is the rudiment of the primi- 
