yi, ON SOME INSECT DEFORMITIES. 
The specimen is a female, of thirty-six mm. length, and perfectly de- 
veloped. The wings are in good and perfect condition, but there is no 
trace of the elytra; which are entirely wanting on both sides. Pro- 
fessor J. Wyman thought at first that the elytra had been removed by 
somebody, and the insect put again at liberty But a careful examina- 
tion of the living insect as well as of the alcoholic specimen by Dr. J. 
L. Leconte, and by myself, showed no lesion whatsoever in the place 
where the elytra should have been inserted. The anterior border of the 
mesothorax is horny and smooth, and near the scutellum exists a small 
membranous place without any wound. The legs, the prothorax, the 
upper part of the mesothorax, the metathorax, the scutellum, and the 
whole abdomen, are perfectly developed. 
This case of deformity belongs to the “monstres ectroméliens” of 
Lacordaire, but as far as I am able to ascertain, no similar case is 
recorded. The fact that the beetle was able to fly without elytra is of 
additional interest. | 
Prionus coriarius. 
This remarkable case is twice recorded, but later entirely overlooked. 
As I believe this kind of deformity of prominent value, I give a trans- 
lation of the origin)] communication by Dr. Saage in Preussische Pro- 
vinzial Blaetter (1859), Vol. XXII, p. 191. 
“ One of my school-boys brought me to-day a male Prionus coriarius, the 
thorax, of which presents a curious deformity. The horny dorsal cover 
of the mesothorax is wanting, and instead of elytra there are inserted, 
just in their place of articulation, two perfect legs, directed above and 
behind. The metathorax has the wings as usual, and the abdomen is 
of the same horny character as commonly, when covered with elytra. 
In attempts at flight the insect moved, together with the wings, the ab- 
normal dorsal legs. The scutellum is wanting, and the prothorax has 
only two spines; all other parts are perfectly developed.” 
“ Braunsberg, Prussia, July 10, 1859.” 
This communication is reprinted in Stett. Ent. Zeit., Vol. I, p. 48. The 
specimen was seen and examined afterwards by Professor von Siebold. 
I have always considered this case to be a striking proof of the 
homology of the wings with the legs. No similar case has been re- 
corded, 
