109 205 
Tellina (Homala) micans, HANLEy, BERTIN, Révision d. Tellinidés, p. 297, No. 222. 
Psammobia micans, Hanuey, Eve. Smita, Ann. and Magaz. Nat. Hist., 7 Ser., XVIII, 1906, p. 260. 
Tellina depauperata, v. MarTeNs, Ann. and Magaz. of Nat. Hist., 3 Ser., vol. 16, 1865, p.429, No. 4. 
— _- — ROmeErR in Martini u. CHEMNITZ, Conchyl. Cabin., X Bd., 4 Abth., p. 254, 
No. 158, pl. 49, figs. 1—3. 
S. of Koh Samit, 20 fathoms, mud (14). W. of Koh Chang, 20 fathoms, mud (1). 
Sound of Koh Chang, 3—5 fathoms, soft clay (*/2 dead specimens). Koh Kahdat 
(fragment). 
Long. 11—29 mm. 
Distribution:— Persian Gulf (EpG.Smirn), Mekran coast (MELVILL & STANDEN), 
Aden (SHOPLAND). — Philippines. 
Epa. Smiru (loc. cit.) thinks that the present species “on account of the absence 
of lateral teeth and the oblique sculpture” must be referred to Psammobia, but I 
am convinced that he is wrong in this; the absence of the lateral teeth being typical 
of the subgenus Peronaea, and the oblique sculpture being found in so many other 
species of Tellina. 
Tellina (Metis) coarctata, Phil. 
Tellina coarctata, R. A. Puivirri, Zeitschrift f. Malakozool., 1845, p. 151, No. 11. 
— lacunosa, (non CHEMNITz), HANLEY in Sowersy, Thesaur. Conchyl., I, p. 322, No. 197. pl. 65, fig. 252. 
_ - — ReeEvE, Conchol. icon., XVII, Tellina, Sp. 25. 
— (Metis) lacunosa, (non CHEMNITZ), ROMER in Martini u. CHEMNITZ, Conchyl. Cabin., X Bd., 4 Abth., 
p. 201, No. 120, pl. 38, figs. 10—12. 
North of Koh Kam, 5 fathoms, gravel ('/2). 
Long. 49 mm. 
Distribution: — China. 
I have specimens at hand labelled “Algoa Bay” and “Senegal.” 
It seems to me that Puitiprr has good reason for doubting whether CHEMNITZ’s 
lacunosa “from Guinea” is identical with the “lacunosa from China” of later authors; 
therefore, I have adopted his name coarctata for the latter form. Unfortunately, it 
is very probable that CHEMNITz’s original specimen of lacunosa no longer exists, at 
any rate it is not to be found in the Zoological Museum of the University of Copen- 
hagen, so actual comparison is impossible; but as CHemnirz’s figure and description 
present many characteristic points which are not to be found in coarctata, I think 
we have here two distinct species. 
It is no doubt due to a mistake that SpENGLER' gives “East India” as the 
locality of his T. ephippium. His original specimens are in the Zoological Museum 
of the University of Copenhagen, but on the label, in his own handwriting, no 
locality is given. On comparing SpENGLER’s original specimens of T. ephippium 
with specimens of Say’s intastriata (= T. Gruneri, Phil.*) it is seen that these species 
are absolutely identical, and as SpENGLER’s name has the priority, Say’s intastriata 
and Puiippr’s Gruneri should consequently be regarded only as synonyms of 
1 Skrivter af Naturhistorie-Selskabet, 4 Bind, 2 Hefte, 1798, p. 104. 
2 From Florida Keys, St. Anna (east coast of Mexico) and from many different localities in the 
Lesser Antilles, especially the Danish West Indies. 
