117 213 
Siam (J. de MorGan). 
The Danish Expedition to Siam collected no specimens of this species. 
Distribution: — Malacca, Singapore, Poulo-Penang. — Borneo, Sumatra. 
Soletellina Chinensis, Chemn. 
Solen Diphos Chinensis, Cuemnitz, Conchyl. Cabin., XI, 1795, p. 200, pl. 198, fig. 1933. 
Solenotellina chinensis, - Morcu, Catal. conchyl. que rel. com. de Yoldi, II, 1853, p. 9, No. 88. 
— Chinensis, — Dunker, Index moll. mar. Japon., 1882, p. 187. 
Soletellina chinensis, _ E. v. Martens, Siiss- u. Brackwasser-Moll. d. Ind. Archip., p. 233. 
— truncata, REEVE, Conchol. icon., X, Soletellina, Sp. 9. 
_ — GmMeEt.?, E. v. MARTENS, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1860, p. 18. 
_ planulata, ReEve, Conchol. icon., X, Soletellina, Sp. 15. 
Hiatula — — BerTIN, Révision d. Garidées, p. 87, No.8. 
Siam (Ep. v. MARTENS). 
The Danish Expedition to Siam collected no specimens of this species. 
Distribution: — China, Japan, Moluccas. 
Psammotaea violacea, Lam. 
Psammotea violacea, Lamarck, Hist. nat. d. anim. s. vert., V, 1818, p. 517, No. 1. — éd. 2, VI, p. 181, No. 1. 
— = = Hantey, Catal. of ree. biv. shells, p. 60, Suppl. pl. 12, fig. 60. 
Capsella — REEVE, Conchol. icon., X, Capsella, Sp. 6. 
— — oa E. v. Martens, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1860, p. 18. 
Hiatula (Psammotca) violacea, Lamarck, V. Bertin, Réyision d. Garidées, p. 96, No. 34. 
Psammotaea violacea, Hanury, E. v. MARTENS, Siiss- u. Brackwasser-Moll. d. Ind. Archip., p. 239, No. 2 
Psammotea — Lamarck, HipaLco, Fauna malacol. de 1. isl. Filipinas, II, p. 95, No. 186. 
Soletellina, — _— MExviLL & STanDEN, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1906, p. 842. 
Psammotea serotina, = Hist. nat. d. anim. s. vert., V,'1818, p. 517, No.5. — éd. 2, VI, p. 182, No. 5. 
Siam (Ep. v. MARTENS). 
The Danish Expedition to Siam collected no specimens of this species. 
Distribution: — Karachi (Metvitt & STANDEN), Zanzibar (L. Rousseau ac- 
cording to V. Bertin), Seychelles.! — Hong Kong, Formosa, Japan, Philippines, Java, 
Amboina, Adenare, New Guinea, Kei-Isl., New Caledonia. 
E. v. Marrens doubts whether Lamarck’s violacea is the same species as that 
of Haney and other authors; V. Bertin, who had LamaArcx’s original specimens 
for comparison does not, however, mention anything about this and gives them as 
synonyms. 
Fam. Scrobiculariidae. 
Semele amabilis, A. Ad. 
Semele amabilis, A. AbAMs, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 18538, p. 97, No. 17. 
Amphidesma amabilis, A. ADAMS, Conchol. icon., VIII, Amphidesma, Sp. 32. 
Semele = Epc. Smiru, Rep. on the Lamellibranchiata of the Challenger Exped., p. 83. 
1 Recorded from there by Duro, L. Rousseau and Lantz (V. BerTin); Ep. v. Marrens thinks that 
this is perhaps due to confusion, on the part of Duro, with P. radiata, Desh. 
