190 Bulletin American Museum of Natural History [Vol. XLIII 



This species is represented in the collection b}' three males, all 

 taken at Medje, one in April, one in August, and one in September. 



(253) 7. Diestogyna doriclea infusca (Capronnier) 



Euriphene (sic) infusca Capronnier, 1SS9, Ann. Soc. Ent. Belgique, XXXIII, 



Bull., p. cxlv. 

 Diestogyna doriclea infusca Aurivillius, 1912, Seitz, Gross-Schmett., XIII, p. 168. 



This variety of D. doriclea (Drury) (cf. 111. Exot. Ent., 1782, III, 

 p. 50, PI. XXXVI, figs. 5, 6), which occurs sporadically in collections which 

 we have received from the tropical western coast, appears to be, as 

 Aurivillius has already pointed out, the dominant form in the interior 

 of the Congo Basin. It is represented in the collection by eight males 

 and two females, all taken at Medje, a couple in April, the rest in August 

 and September 1910. 



(254) 8. Diestogyna amaranta Karsch 



Diestogyna amaranta Karsch, 1S94, Bed. Ent. Zeit., XIX, p. 6, fig. 2. Aurivillius, 

 1912, Seitz, Gross-Schmett., XIII, p. 169, PI. xxxviii/. 



There are two males of this species which agree perfectly with the 

 figure and description given by Karsch. They were both captured at 

 Medje in September 1910. 



(255) 9. Diestogyna gambise (Feisthamel) 



Euryphene gambia Feisthamel, 1850, Ann. Soc. Ent. France, (2) VIII, p. 251, PI. 



IX, fig. 2. 

 Diestogyna gambioe Aurivillius, 1912, Seitz, Gross-Schmett., XIII, p. 169, PI. xxxviio. 



Of this well-known and widely distributed species there are eight 

 males and nine females, all taken at Medje, a pair in April, the rest in 

 August 1910. 



(256) 10. Diestogyna atossa (Hewitson) 



Euryphene atossa Hewitson, 1865, Exot. Butt., III. Euryphene. PL iii, figs. 1, 2, 9. 

 Aterica amaxia Hewitson, 1865, Exot. Butt., Ill, Aterica imd Euryphene, PL vi, figs. 



8, 9, 9 . 

 Diestogyna atossa Aurivillius, 1912, Seitz, Gross-Schmett., XIII, p. 169, PL 

 xxxviia, b. 



Of this famiUar species there are five males and three females, all 

 taken at Medje in August and September. 



In addition to the ten foregoing species which are referable to forms 

 already known and described, I find in the collection two specimens 

 which have given me a good deal of trouble and which I can not refer to 

 any species the descriptions and figures of which are known to me. 



