208 Bullelin American Museum of Natural History [Vol. XLIII 



(305) * 16. Charaxes ameliae Doumet 



Charaxes amelice Doumet, 1861, Rev. Zool., (2) XIII, p. 171, PI. v, fig. 1. Aurivillius, 



1911, Seitz, Gross-Schmett., XIII, p. 133, PI. xxxi6. 



There are one hundred and ninety-two specimen-s of this species in 

 the collection, forty-one of which have not been expanded. They are 

 all males. They were taken at Medje, a number early in April, the 

 rest from July to the middle of September. 



(306) 17. Charaxes hadrianus Ward 



C/iaraxes /ladnanws Ward, 1870, Ent. Mo. Mag., VIII, p. 120. Aurivillius, 1911. 

 Seitz, Gros.5-Schmett., XIII, p. 133, P). xxxid. 



Represented by twenty-seven males, six not expanded, all taken at 

 Medje. One was caught in April, the rest from July to September, but 

 the greater number were taken in August. 



(307) 18. Charaxes nobilis Druce 



Charaxes nobilis Druce, 1873, Ent. Mo. Mag., X, p. 13. Aurivillius, 1911, Seitz, 

 Gross-Schmett., XIII, p. 133, PI. xxxiic. 



A single male specimen of this rare species was taken at Medje on 

 May 29, 1910. It lacks one antenna and is sUghtly rubbed. 



(308) 19. Charaxes anticlea (Drury) 



Papilio anticlea Drury, 1782, 111. Exot. Ent., Ill, p. 36, PI. xxvii, figs. 5, 6. 



Charaxes anticlea Aurivillius, 1911, Seitz, Gro.ss-Schmect., XIII, p. 134, PI. xxxiiid. 



Six males captured at Medje, the dates varying from Juty to Sep- 

 tember. 



(309) 20. Charaxes hildebrandti (Dewitz) 



Nymphalis hildebrandti Dewitz, 1879, Nov. Act. Acad. Nat Cur., XLI, p. 28, PL ii, 



fig. 16. 

 Charaxes hildebrandti Aurivillius, 1911, Seitz, Gross-Schmett.., XIII p. 134, PL 



XXXIIIC. 



Nine males taken at Medje from Juh' to September. 



(310) 21. Charaxes etheocles (Cramer) 



Papilio etheocles Cramer, 1777, Pap. E.xot., II, p. 34, PL cxix, figs. D, E. 



Charaxes etheocles Aurivillius, 1911, Seitz, Gross-Schmett., XIII, p. 135, PL xxxiii6. 



Of this polj^morphic and decidedly puzzling species there is a large 

 series of males and a solitary female. The female, which was taken at 

 Medje, June 28, 1910, does not agree absolutely with any form of the 

 iemale figured by authors, but comes nearest to that given by Staud- 



