1920] HoUnnd, Lepidoptera of the Congo 259 



Pardaleodes Butler 



(469) 1. Pardaleodes edipus (Cramer) 



Papilio edipus Cramer, 1782, Pap. Exot., IV, p. 146, PI. ccclxvi, figs. E, F, d^. 

 Pamphila {?) sator Doubleday and Hewitson, 1852, Gen. Diurn. Lep., II, p. 523, 



PI. Lxxix, fig. 4, 9 . 



(For further synonymy (^f • Holland, 1896, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, p. 75.) 



There are three males and one female referable to this species. All 

 of them were taken at Medje in the months of July and August 1910. 



(470) 2. Pardaleodes incerta (Snellen) 

 Pamphila incerta Snellen, 1872, Tijd. v. Ent., p. 29, PI. x, figs. 10-12, cf . 

 Hesperia coanza Plcetz, 1883, Stett. Ent. Zeit., XLIV, p. 232, 9 . 

 Pardaleodes incerta Holland, 1896, Pi'oc. Zool. Soc. London, p. 75. 



Four males; three taken at Medje, two in July, the other in August; 

 the fourth specimen caught at Niangara, November 26, 1910. 



(471) 3. Pardaleodes bule Holland 



Pardaleodes bule Holland, 1896, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, p. 76, PI. iii, fig. 21. 



Two specimens from Medje, one collected in April, the other in 

 August 1910. 



(472) 4. Pardaleodes fan (Holland) 



Osmodes (?) fan Holland, 1894, Ent. News, V, p. 91, PI. ni, fig. 8. 

 Pardaleodes fan Holland, 1896, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, p. 79. 



Two specimens caught at Medje, August 1910. 

 Cebatrichia Butler 



(473) 1. Cera trie hia ialemia H. H. Druce 



Ceratrichia ialemia H. H. Druce, 1909, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, p. 413, PI. lxvii, 

 fig. 10. 



One male taken at Medje, August 13, 1910, which agrees closely 

 with the desciiption and figure given by Druce. The species is very 

 near to C. nothus (Fabricius) and is probably only a form of that. 



(474) 2. Ceratrichia phocion (Fabricius) 



Papilio phocion Fabricius, 1781, Spec. Ins., II, p. 138. 



Ceratrichia phocion Butler, 1870, Cat. Fabr. Diurn. Lep., p. 274, PI. iii, fig. 14. 



Holland, 1896, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, p. 79. 

 Apaustus argyrosticta Plcetz, 1879, Stett. Ent. Zeit., XL, p. 358, 9 . 



Four males and one female of this common insect, all taken at Medje 

 from July to September 1910. The females are variable in the number 

 and size of the small light markings on the wings, as are also the males to 

 a less extent. There are before me as I write several hundreds of speci- 



