1920] Holland, Lepnlopicra of the Congo 301 



(624) 2. Nephelefunebris(Fabricms) 

 Sphinx funebris Fabricius, 1793, Ent. >Syst., Ill, part 1, p. 371. 



Nephele funebris funebris Rothschild and Jordan, 1903, Nov. Zool, IX, Suppl., part 

 1, p. 557. 



One male labelled as taken at Stanlej^ville, April 8, 1915. 



(625) 2a. Nephele funebris maculosa Rothschild and Jordan 

 Nephele funebris maculosa Rothschild and Jordan, 1903, Nov. Zool., IX, Suppl., 



part 1, p. 558. 



Of this varietal form there are eight male specimens; one taken at 

 :\Iatadi, June 24, 1909; two captured at Ngayu, March 1910; five 

 from Stanleyville, two caught in February and two in March, and one in 

 April 1915. 



(626) 3. Nephele bipartita Butler 



Nephele bipartita Butler, 1878, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., (5) II, p. 455. 



One male from Matadi, caught June 24, 1909. 



(627) 4. Nephele peneus (Cramer) 



Sphinx peneus Cramer, 1776, Pap. Exot., I, p. 139, PI. lxxxviii, fig. D. 

 Nephele peneus peneus Rothschild and Jordan, 1903, Nov. Zool., IX, Suppl., part 1, 

 p. 560. 



One female captured at Medje in July 1910. 



(628) 5. Nephele accentifera (Palisot de Beauvois) 



Sphinx accentifera Palisot de Beauvois, 1805, Ins. Rec. en Afrique et Amerique, 



Lep., p. 264, PI. XXIV, fig. 1. 

 Nephele accentifera Rothschild and Jordan, 1903, Nov. Zool., IX, Suppl., part 



1, p. 560. 



Two females: one from Medje, July 8, 1910; the other taken at 

 Faradje, Deceml)er 13, 1912. 



Temnora Hiibner 



(629) 1. Temnora fumosa (Walker) 

 Zoniliafumosa Walker, 1856, List Lep. Het. B. M., VIII, p. 193. 



Temnora fumosa Rothschild and Jordan, 1903, Nov. Zool., IX, Suppl., part 1, p. 

 574, PI. xiii.fig. 5, cf . 



Two males, one from Gamangui, February 8, the other from INIedje, 

 March 19, 1910. 



(630) 2. Temnora species (?) 



There is a remnant of a specimen taken at Poko, August 19, 1913,, 

 which comes near T. eranga Holland but is evidently different and prob- 

 ably represents an undescribed species, but the insect, or what is left 

 of it, is in too dilapidated a condition to justifj^ the attempt to describe it. 



