90 THE ENTOMOLOGIST. 



into two sections, the first of which contains those caught in 

 July or in July and August, the second those caught in August 

 only. 



Those caught in July or in July and August were Parnassius 

 apollo ? ; Aporia cratccgi ^ and ? ; Pieris hrassicce, P. rapa, 

 P.napi; Euchloe cardamines, E. euphenoides S ; Leptidia sinajns 

 ? , L.duponcheli {see infra) ; Colias edusa <? and ? ; Qonepteryx 

 rhamni S' and ? , Limenitis Camilla ; Melitcea didyma ? , M. 

 deione, M. athal'ia, M. parthenic $ and ? : Argynnis aglaia $■ , 

 Dryas paphia S ; Poli/gonia C. -album ; Eugonia polychloros, 

 Pyrameis atalanta, Vanessa io, Melanargia lachesis, Satyrus alcyone 

 ^ and ? ; S. circe ^ ; Hipparchia semele ? ; Pararge moera, 

 var. adrasta ? ; P. megara 3" ; P- egeria, Einnephele janira ? ; 

 E . tithonus 3" ; E . pasiphae 3 ', Aphantopus hyperanthus 2 ; Coeno- 

 nympha arcaniiis, Erehia evias (this is a very late date), Thecla 

 cescidi, Lcesopis rohoris S ; Chrysophanus dorilis ? ; C. phlaas, 

 Aricia medon, Polyommatas icarus S and ? ; Agriades escheri, 

 Celastrina argiolns 3 ', and. Adop(?a linea. 



The following species, varieties, and sex not caught in July 

 were met with in August: Tphiclides podalirius, var. {9 p>rotesilaus)\ 

 3 and ? ; Pieris napi var. napace ; Le2)tidia sijiapis var. erysimi, 

 L. sinapis, var. diniensis, MelitcBa didyma 3 , Melanargia galatea* 

 Hipparchia hriseis ? ; Satyrus statilinus, var. cdlionia $ ; Coeno- 

 nympha pamphilus S ; C. pamphilus, var. lyllus : Agriades hellargus 

 3 ; A. corydon 3 ; Carcharodus alcece ; Thanaos tages ? ; Hesperia 

 sao, Augiades sylvanus 3 ; and Erynnis comma ? . 



In addition to these I saw at least two other butterflies 

 which I failed to identify. One of them was, or resembled 

 Euvanessa antiopa. It took to flight and soared out of reach and 

 quite left the locality. This happened in the valley of >the 

 Sahorre. The other resembled the variety of podalirius which I 

 caught, but was of a much darker yellow tint. 



Iphiclides podalirius, var. {? protesilans <? and $ ),t August 

 2nd, 1916, and August 4th, 1916. Both examples differ from 

 podalirius and from feisthamelii in having only a narrow black 

 streak instead of a broad black band along tbe inner margin on 

 the upper surface of the hind wing. The abdomen, instead of 

 being black as in podalirius, is black above and white below, and 

 the division between the two colours is very sharp and well 

 defined. The hind margin on the upper surface of the hind wing 

 is strongly ochreous iu one example (3) and slightly so in the 

 other (? ). In this respect and in the ground colour, which is 

 very pale straw, the examples resemhle feisthamelii. But, other- 

 wise, they are dissimilar from that variety as described and 

 depicted in Lang's ' Butterflies of Europe.' 



* As M. galatea is not known to occur in tbe same locality as M. lacliesis inthi» 

 region, a further note is desirable (H. R,-B.). 

 " t Cp. following note (H. R.-B.). • 



