ON SOME FURTHER DRAGONFLIES FROM MACEDONIA. 205 



Agrion pulchelluvi, Lind.— 6 J , 26 ? , Yenidje Vcirdar,. 

 5, V ; 1 3 , Stavi'os, 23, v; 1 c? , L. Besliik, 1-3, vi. 

 A. scitidum, Ramb. — 1 3' , Stavros, 23, v. 

 Krythronnna naias, Hansem. — 1 ? , L. Beshik, 1-3, vi. 

 E. riridulum, Charp. — 1 ? , Stavros, 23, v. 



Family .ESCHNIDiE. 

 . . Subfamily GOMPHIN.E. 



Va)ideria tetraphijlUi, Lind. — 1 J , 1 ? , Lake Ardzan, 

 near Dragomir, 11, viii. Abundant, but bard to secure. *' It 

 settles, bowever, every now and tben on sand or stones, and my 

 specimens were got after a long stalk in each case " (J. W.). 

 This is one of the most interesting of the Gomphinw, by reason 

 of its possessing, in both sexes, dilated margins to segment 7, as 

 well as to segment 8. 



Goinphus Jiavipes, Charp. — 1 <? , 1 $ , L. Beshik, 1-3, vi ; 

 1 3 . Stavros, 7-8, vi. 



G. vulfiatissiiniis, Linn. — 1 3 , L. Beshik, 1-3, vi ; 1 $ , 

 Rendino Gorge, 8, vi. 



Onijchogoinplius forcipatiis, Linn. — ^2 ? , L. Beshik, 1-3, 

 vi ; 2 3 , Rendino Gorge, 8, vi. 



Subfamily .tESCHNIN.E. 



Anax impemtor, Leach — 1 3 ,L. x\dji Geul, 4, viii. 



A. parthenope, Selys — 2 ? , L. Beshik, 1-3, vi ; 1 3,1^, 

 Rendino Gorge, 8, vi ; 1 ($ , L. Adji Geul, 4, viii. 



Mschna mixta, Latr. — 1 3 , Janes Hill, 21, x ; 8 <? , 1 ? , 

 Lower Jumeaux Ravine, near Doiran, 28, x. 



M. isosceUii, Miill.— 5 3, 2 ? , L. Beshik, 1-3, vi ; 1 3, 

 Stavros, 7-8, vi. 



Family LIBELLULIDiE. 



Subfamily LIBELLULIN^. 



Orthetriim anceps, Schneid. — 2 3,1 ? , L. Beshik, 1-3, vi : 

 1 (J , 1 ? , Stavros, 7-8, vi ; 2 c? , Rendino Gorge, 8, vi. The 

 characters of this species, as known from Macedonia, are not 

 very constant. When compared with material from Tunis, for 

 example, it is seen that the two males from Rendino Gorge are 

 not typical representatives of 0. anceps, and a profile view of the 

 genitalia somewhat suggests 0. ccsnilescens, Fabr. At the same 

 time, they cannot be referred to the Fabrician species, as the 

 less bulky and more distinctly cleft anterior lamina, for instance, 

 sufficiently shows. It seems to be advisable to regard such 

 specimens as coming within the range of variation of 0. anceps, 

 and Mr. Morton concurs in this view. 



