Table EII. 



PI »NI PROUUCTinN aNllYSl';, TUNOR« BinnE, B4BR0H PROJECI, IBP 0»T« SET iluOl 

 OUTPUT 04TA f-CH SPE(.1E<; C.AUUATILIS L U 



0»T4 REf. SITt PLOT TUiT FPFSH/UHT CHL A/B G DRV UT/SO H HEI/DRr «G CHL/C ORr HG CHl/SO H MG CHl/50 OH NG CMl/G HE T 



10334 2 6 B4»»«»»«««« 13.1055 21.9029 2.7733 6.7644 148.1607 «.»..••»•• 2.4391 



10335 7 6 9fl««»««>««« 14.7605 42.0334 ^.9346 6.7100 282.0427 ..»..«»••« 2.2863 



10336 2 ' o»"»«»«»»« 13.1549 28.0517 2.8985 5.9290 lft6.3192 .»»«.«.««« 2.0455 



10337 7 / 2B •••• 9.4154 31.8540 2.0897 4.9949 159.1078 «..«.«»••« 7.3903 



10338 2 1 36« «• 9.1369 13.6176 3.0987 6.91B9 95.6028 «•«•»»•••• 2.2329 



1033'( 7 9 84 •••• 2.6735 1.4435 2.6533 5.1366 7.4146 .««.«.««•« 1.9159 



10340 7 lb I......... 16.040'. 17.(390 2.4135 7.0107 171.5581 «...••••»• 2.904fl 



10341 2 11) 9B«. ••«<«•• 13.9912 30.2222 2.8664 6.5222 197.1148 »•«..««..» 2.2754 



SUM ••••«»t«*p 92.2764 186.6641 21.7281 49.9867 1177.3201 •••••••••• 18.5103 



G ORV/SQ ** 23.3330 



MEAN CO 11.5146 23.3330 2.7160 6.2483 147.1650 0.0 2.3138 



STO.OEV. 0.0 4.3193 12.5340 0.3254 0.6013 79.3203 0.0 0.2914 



EBRUR 0.0 1.1152 3.2363 0.0840 0.2069 70.4604 0.0 0.0752 



N 06888608 



SUHMftRY Fcfl All SPECIES bY CUAO 



QUADRAT 



20664 



70696 



20700 



20728 



20936 



20964 



21001 



2109B 



SU" 



MEAN 



STDOEV. 



ERROR 



N 



input to the primary production programs. From the raw data, 

 the following output parameters were generated: Fresh/Dry Ratio; 

 Milligrams Chlorophyll/Sq. Meter; Milligrams Chlorophyll/Sq. Deci- 

 meter; Grams Dry Weight/Sq. Meter; Wet/Dry Ratio; Milligrams 

 Chlorophyll/Gram Dry Weight; Milligrams Chlorophyll/Grams Wet 

 Weight; Chlorophyll A/B. These values were calculated for each 

 sample and summarized by species. In addition, output data for 

 each quadrat included a summation of grams dry weight per square 

 meter, milligrams chlorophyll per square meter, and milligrams 

 chlorophyll per gram dry weight. Means, standard deviation, and 

 standard error were calculated throughout. 



3. Plant Nutrient (Table EIII, Fig. El). These programs accept raw 

 laboratory data and output detailed analysis. Input data consists 

 of identification of the species, location, date of the sample, 

 dry weight; percentages of each element as used in calibration 

 curve (percentage transmission) ; ppm figures relating to the 

 transmission values; order of the polynomial which is to be fit 

 for the calibration; dilution factor for each element; blank 

 value for each element; and an instruction card to indicate 

 which of several processing routes is to be followed for this 

 particular sample. Standard default options are provided through- 

 out, as is the ability to carry the calibration data forward from 

 one sample calculation to another. The program does a polynomial 



141 



