MOEPHOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION. 49 



logical whole, and their several met{imorphoses are so ordered 

 and related to one another that they constitute members of a 

 mutually dependent commonalty. 



The 3Ietazoa are the only animals which fall under com- 

 mon observation, and have therefore been known from the 

 earliest times. All the higher languages possess general 

 names equivalent to our beast, bird, reptile, fish, insect, and 

 worm ; and this shows the very early perception of the fact 

 that, notwithstanding the wonderful diversity of animal forms, 

 they are modeled upon comparatively few great types. 



In the middle of the last century the founder of modern 

 Taxonomj', Linnaeus, distinguished animals into 3IammaUa, 

 Aves, A7nphibia, Pisces, Insecta, and Vermes, that is to say, 

 he converted common-sense into science by defining and giv- 

 ing precision to the rough distinctions arrived at by ordinary 

 observation. 



At the end of the centur\^, Lamarck made a most impor- 

 tant advance in general morpholog}'-, by pointing out that 

 mammals, birds, reptiles, and fishes, are formed upon one type 

 or coramcm pkoi, the essential character of which is the pos- 

 session of a spinal column, interposed between a cerebro-spi- 

 nal and a visceral cavity ; and that in no other animals is the 

 same plan of construction to be discerned. Hence he drew a 

 broad distinction between the former and the latter, as the 

 Vertebrata and the Ixvertebrata. But the advance of 

 knowledge respecting the structure of invertebrated animals, 

 due chiefly to Swammerdam, Trembley, Reaumur, Peyssonel, 

 Goeze, Roesel, Ellis, Fabricius, O. F. Miiller, Lyonet, Pallas, 

 and Cuvier, speedily proved that the Invertebrata are not 

 framed upon one fundamental plan, but upon several ; and, 

 in 1795, Cuvier^ showed that, at fewest, three morphological 

 types, as distinct from one another as they are from that of 

 the vertebrated animals, are distinguishable among the In- 

 vertehrata. These he named — I. Mollusques ; II. Insectes et 

 Vers ; HI. Zoophj^tes. In the " Reo^ne animal " (1816), those 

 terms are Latinized, Animalia Mollnsca, Articidata, and Ba- 

 diata. Thus, says Cuvier : " It will be found that there ex- 

 ist four principal forms, four general plans, if it may thus be 

 expressed, on which all animals appear to have been modeled ; 

 and the ulterior divisions of which, under whatever title natu- 

 ralists may have designated them, are merely slight modifica- 

 tions, founded on the development or addition of certain parts. 



1 Tableau elementah-e de I'Histoire des Animaux. An vi. 



