EEPOET ON THE NEMERTEA. 39 



gelatinous mass, in which granular S2:)herical bodies with large and distinct nuclei 

 (about one-fifth of the diameter of the body-wall on this sjDot) seem to be suspended. 

 Is this a local injury? Are these bodies enclosed gregarines or other parasitical 

 unicellular organisms ? 



These questions can as yet only be formulated but not answered, and I would call 

 the attention of future observers dealing with fresh material to similar cases, which no 

 doubt must be accompanied by some externally visible distinction between the tissues. 



Of the Bermuda specimen, which I refer to this species only with doubt, and which 

 measured 33 mm. in length by 2^ mm. in diameter, the integument was very imperfectly 

 preserved ; still it corresponds in the remaining characters with the other specimens of 

 Cerebratidus truncatus. There are also points of agreement in the structure of the 

 proboscidian sheath. 



The transverse blood-vessels are very thick-walled in this specimen, a feature more 

 particularly due to the basement-tissue below the inner epithelial lining. 



Cerehratidus mcduUatus, n. sp. (PL XI. fig. 10 ; PL XII. figs. 9, 10). 



It is hardly consistent with the most lenient rules of zoological nomenclature, and it 

 is certainly not consistent with those which I have myself advocated in my introduction, to 

 establish a new species on a fragment which has neither head nor tail ! Still, as I have been 

 rather careful on other occasions, and that especially with regard to genera, I may be trusted 

 to be anxious to guard against superfluous additions to an already cumbersome sjmonymy. 

 The reasons by which I am guided in putting up this mutilated spirit fragment as the 

 type of a new species are purely morphological, and, as will be seen in the paragraph 

 treating of the nervous system, the peculiarities offered by this species are of sufficient 

 morphological interest to give it a place by itself, and (in at the same time naming it) to 

 direct the attention of collecting naturalists to this form. 



It came up in the same haul of the dredge as did one of the sj)ecimens of Cerehratulus 

 truncatus- just described, viz., at Station 49, off Nova Scotia, from a depth of 85 fathoms. 



In sections it is, however, immediately seen to be distinguished from the foregoing 

 species by several features, the first of which concerns the integument. Instead of the 

 integument being separated from the longitudinal outer muscular layer by a more or less 

 massive expanse of basement-tissue (PL XIII. fig. 6), the integument itself being divided 

 into a superficial and a deeper glandular layer (which are separated by a secondary 

 basement membrane and an expanse of fibres, such as is found in Cerehratulus 

 corrugatus, Cerehratidus truncatus, &c., also in the Challenger collection), our present 

 species has the superficial layer of the integument immediately applied to the outer 

 longitudinal muscles, from which it is thus only separated by the outer secondary basement 

 layer just alluded to (PL XII. fig. 10). This fact causes the integument in transverse 



