REPORT ON THE NEMERTEA. 45 



surrounding the cesojjhagus may very evidently be seen to be in dii-ect connection witli 

 that in the head — a fact known to Blanchard, and for the first time fully described by 

 Oudemans (loc. cit.), but never adequately figured. This figure, at the same time, 

 demonstrates the projection of the posterior brain-lobe into this blood-space, by the con- 

 tents of which it is thus bathed. 



Another figure reveals how the sections of Cerehratulus angusticeps were important in 

 another respect, viz.. that of the medio-dorsal medullary nerve and the transverse branches 

 springing from it in metamerically arranged pairs (PI. XIV. fig. 1). Nor was this 

 regularity exceptional in the region figured ; it was characteristic wherever these trans- 

 verse nerve-tracts (which will be discussed more fully in their relation to the plexus in 

 the special paragraph) were met witli, and was thus equally distinct ventrally and dorsally. 

 Ventrally, however, there is no median longitudinal stem. 



On the other hand, the transverse tracts in Cerehratulus angusticeps may be traced 

 as high up as the lower brain-lobes, which they connect till just behind the strong 

 ventral commissure of these lobes. 



These transverse commissural trunks are distinctly separate from those by which the two 

 stems of the vaojus nerve are united close to their origin and in front of the mouth. The latter 

 {cf. PI. XIV. fig. 5) are also present as distinct commissures in Cerehratulus angusticeps. 



With respect to the nephridia, which often ofi"er certain points of comparison for the 

 different species, I must state that the anterior part of the longitudinal duct is very 

 distinctly seen in the horizontal sections through the anterior extremity of the body, and 

 occupies its usual position in the circumoesophageal blood-sjiace, whereas its size or its- 

 histological details showed no special features. The deferent ducts of the nephridial 

 system were not contained in this section, nor in those made through the remaining 

 fragments of the further portions of the body. They were very probably situated in the 

 intervening part, which was sacrificed by M'Intosh in drawing up his preliminary notes, 

 and I cannot thus state with certainty whether these ducts were single or more 

 numerous, terminal or not. 



To Cerehratulus angusticeps I must refer another specimen which came up in the 

 dredge at Station 168 from a depth of 1100 fathoms. It was much torn and lacerated 

 (PI. I. fig. 15), a phenomenon which it would, however, be rash to attribute to the depth 

 from which it was brought up, although the possibility of that being the cause cannot be 

 wholly excluded. The reasons for identifying the specimens with Cerehratulus arigusticeps 

 are the following, and are deduced from the comparison of the sections : — (1) The length 

 of the superior brain-lobes stands to that of the posterior in the same (uncommon) rela- 

 tions as in the specimen above described ; (2) the ventral and parallel commissures of the 

 inferior brain-lobes are similarly very conspicuous ; (3) certain histological details of the 

 superior brain-lobes and ciliated canal, and also of the nerve plexus, are identical ; (4) the 

 aspect of the rhynchodaeum is very similar. 



