276 Mr. H. J. Elwes 



6. Ujnoicphele edmondsii. 



E. edmondsii, Butler, Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond., 1881, 

 p. 451, PI. XXI, fig. 2. 



This seems to be a distinct species, which was described 

 from one specimen only, taken near the Baths of Chilian 

 in March by Edmonds. This specimen is in the British 

 Museum, and agrees very closely with two in that collec- 

 tion from Cordoba and two from Uruguay sent bv Berg to 

 Zeller. 



7. Bpi7iephele ja7iirioides. 



E. janirioides, Blanchard, t.c, p. 34, PI. II, fig. 8 $ . 

 Saiyrus /momffs, Phil ippi, i!. c, p. 268 $ ; Reed, t.c, 



' PI. II, fig. 7. 

 Var. Epineijhele dryas, Felder, Reise der Nov. Lep., 

 iii, p. 492 (1867). 



This was common at the Bahos de Cauquenes on dry 

 hill-sides covered with bushes from the 18th to 21st of 

 Deceniber, and at San Ignacio in January. It is common 

 at Valparaiso in November and December, and has been 

 taken at Talcahuano and at Valdivia. The specimens in 

 the British Museum from this locality are smaller than 

 mine but not otherwise different. As I think Blanchard's 

 figure of this species is unmistakable I adopt his name. 



8. Ejmiephelc monachus. 



Satyriis monachus, Blanchard, t. c, jd. 35. 



Epincphdc valdivim, Felder, t. c, p. 493. 



Fcdaliodcs lugiibris, Butler, Cist. Ent., i, p. 25 (1870). 



Stihomorp)Jia monachus, id., Lep. Exot., p. 179, 

 PI. XIIT, fig. 2 (1874); Reed, t. c, PI. II, fig. 5, 

 and explic. de las laminas, lam. ii, figs. 5, 6. 



Satyrus luctuosns, Reed, t. c, PI. II, fig. 6 % . 



This species was very abundant in the heavy virgin 

 forest south of Temuco, where it was fresh out on Januaiy 

 10th. It was also very abundant amongst the dense 

 bamboo undergrowth in the Upper Renaico Valley at 

 3500 feet at the end of January, and was common in 

 similar forest on Lake Quillen and at Port Blest in the 

 middle of February, when it seemed to be nearly over. 

 I cannot distinguish the insect which Reed figures badly 

 under the name of Inctuosus. 1 have compared the type 

 of valdivia}, Feld., with my specimens from Temuco, and 

 believe, it to be identical. 



