MONOGRAPH OP THE AMPHINOMACEA. 281 



agree with tliose of Ghloeia capillata figiired by M.-Edwards in 

 figs. Id, e of pi. 9, in the Crochard edition of the ' Eegne Ani- 

 mal,' and by Kinberg in the Tregatt. Eugen. Eesa,' plate xi. 

 fig. 1, H, G. The description of these setae by Savigny, " celles 

 des rames superieures simplement aigues, les autres terminees 

 par un pointe distincte," though agreeing better with Quatre- 

 fages's description of these organs, is not sufficiently precise to 

 determine the question of the distinction of the two species. 

 If the species quoted as Ghloeia flava by Quatrefages be distinct, 

 I think it ought to be formed into a different species and de- 

 serves better the name of incerta. 



Sp. 2. ? Chxoeia Quateefagesii. 



Chloeia flava, Quatrefages (without any of the synonyms quoted by 



him). Hist. Nat. des Anneles, i. 386. no. 1. 

 Hab. Seas of China, Quatrefages. 

 Sp. 3. Chloeia Candida. 



Chloeia Candida, Kinberg, Of vers. Kongl. Vetensk.-Akad. Forhandl. 

 1857, p. 11 ; Fregatt. Eugen. Resa, Zool. Annulat. tab. xi. f. 2, 

 2a -2x ; Cams, Handbuch der Zoologie, ii. 435. 

 Hab. A small species coming from the Island of St. Thomaa 

 (PWest Indies), Werngren fide Kinberg. 

 Sp. 4. Chloeia purcigeea. 



Chloeia furcigera, Quatrefages, Hist. Nat. des Anneles, i. 309. 

 Hab. Mauritius, Quatrefages. 



The specimen from which Quatrefages drew up the description 

 of this species is in such bad condition, he says, that he can only 

 draw attention to the setae of the feet, which are bifid in both 

 dorsal and ventral feet. 

 Sp. 5. ? Chloeia ineemis. 



Chloeia egena?, Grube, Beschr. neuer od. wenig bekannt. Ann. 18.55, 



p. 91. 

 Chloeia inermis, Quatrefages, Hist. Nat. Anneles, tom. i. p. 389. 

 ffab. New Zealand, Quatrefages. 

 Sp. 6. Chloeia egena. 



? Chloeia egena, Grube, Beschr. neu. od. wen. bekannt. Ann. in Archiv 

 d. Naturg. 1855, p. 91 ; Quatrefages, Hist. Nat. Anneles, tom. i. 

 p. 391. 



Hab. ? (in the Museum of St. Petersburg), Kinberg. 



This species is doubtful, according to Quatrefages, and, he says, 

 may prove to be identical with his G. inermis {vide Sp. 13 of this 

 list). 



16* 



