13' 



03. JULLIEN, J. et Calvet, L. — Bryozoaires provenant des Campagnes de rHirondelle. Res. Camp. Sci. 



Prince de Monaco, Fasc. XXIII, Bryozoaires, 1903. 



04. Kemna, a. — L'origine de la corde dorsale. Ann. Soc. Roy. Zool. et Malacol. Belgique (Bull, des 



seances), XXXIX, 1904, p. i [sep.]. 



01. Kerr, J. G. — The Development of Lepidosiren. II. Quart. J. Micr. Sci., XLV, 1902, p. 3 [Methods]. 



go. Lang, A. — Zum Verstandniss der Organisation von Cephalodiscus. Jen. Zeitschr. XXV, 1891, p. i. 



84. Lankester, E. R. — a Contribution to the Knowledge of Rhabdopleiira. Quart. J. Micr. Sci., XXIV, 

 1884, p. 622. 



85. Article "Polyzoa". Encycl. Britann. 9"' Ed., XIX, 1885, pp. 430, 434. 



03. LONGCHAMPS, M. DE Selys. — Uber Phoronis und Actinotrocha bei Helgoland. Wiss. Meeresuntersuch. 



(N. F)., VI, Abt. Helgoland, Heft i, 1903. 



04. — — Developpement Postembryonnaire et Aflinites des Phoronis. Mem. Classe Sci. Acad. Belgique, 



I [sep. J. 



96. MacBride, E. W. — The Development of Asterina. Quart. J. Micr. Sci., XXXVIII, 1896, p. 339 [p. 395]. 



98. — — The Early Development of Amphioxus. Quart. J. Micr. Sci. XL, 1898, p. 589. 



00. Further Remarks on the Development oi Amphioxus. Quart. J. Micr. Sci., XLIII, 1900, p. 351. 



82. MTntosh, W. C. Preliminary notice of Cephalodiscus, a new Type allied to Prof. Allman's Rhabdo- 

 pleiira, dredged in H. M. S. 'Challenger'. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5) X, 1882, p. 337. 



83. Preliminary Note on Cephalodiscus, a new form allied to Prof. Allman's Rhabdopleiira. Rep. 



Brit. Ass. (Southampton, 1882), 1883, p. 596. 



87. Report on Cephalodiscus dodecalophus. Challenger Reports, Zool., XX, Pt. LXII, 1887. 



88. Report on Phoronis buskii. Challenger Reports, Zool., XXVII, Pt. LXXV, 1S88. 



96 (i). Masterman, a. T. — Preliminary Note on the Structure and Affinities of Phoronis. Proc. Roy. 

 Soc. Edinburgh, XXI, 1897, p. 59. 



96 (2). On the Structure of Actinotrocha considered in relation to the suggested Chordate affinities 



of Phoronis. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, XXI, 1897, p. 129. 



96 (3)- ■ Preliminary Note on the anatomy of Actinotrocha. Zool. Anz., XIX, 1896, p. 266. 



97 (')• 0» the Diplochorda. I. The Structure of Actinotrocha. Quart. J. Micr. Sci., XL, 1898, p. 281. 



97 (2). On the Diplochorda. II. On the Structure of Cephalodiscus dodecalophus. Quart. J. Micr. Sci., 



XL, 1898, p. 340. 



97 (3). On the 'Notochord' of Cephalodiscus. Zool. Anz., XX, 1897, p. 443. 



98 (i). On the Theory of Archimeric Segmentation and its bearing upon the Phyletic Classification 



of the Coelomata. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, XXII, 1900, p. 270. 



98 (2). On the further Anatomy and the Budding Processes of Cephalodiscus dodecalophus. Trans. 



Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, XXXIX, 1900, p. 507. 



99 (i). On the origin of the Vertebrate Notochord and Pharyngeal Clefts. Rep. Brit. Ass. (Bristol, 



1898) 1899, p. 914. 



99 (2) On the "Notochord" of Cephalodiscus. Zool. Anz., XXII, 1899, pp. 359, 361. 



00. On the Diplochorda. III. The Early Development and Anatomy of Phoronis Buskii. Quart. 



J. Micr. Sci., XLIII, 1900, p. 375. 



02. The Early Development of Crihrella oculata. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, XL, Pt. II, N" 19, 



1902, p. 373 [p. 403J. 



03. On the Diplochorda. IV. On the Central Complex of Cephalodiscus dodecalophus. Quart. J. 



Micr. Sci., XLVI, 1903, p. 715. 



94. Morgan, T. H. — The Development of Balanoglossus. Journ. Morphol. IX, 1894, p. i. 



