BIBLIOGRAPHICAL AND NOMENCLATORIAL NOTES, ETC. 257 



N.B. — This is a synonym of Moiiophleha, Latr., as will be noted 

 shortly by Prof. Cockerell. 



P. 31. To Callipappus add Gallipappus, Sign., 1869, Ann. S. 

 Ent. France (4), ix. 103. 



P. 46. To Opisthoscclis add Ophistoscelis, Sign., op. cit. 100. 



P. 57. For AmorpJiococus read Amorphococcus. 



P. 82. The first citation of Dactylopius tomentosus is Coccus 

 tomentosus, Lamarck, 1801, Syst. Anim. sans vertebres, p. 299. 

 N.B. — Lamarck himself gives this as a synonym of Coccus 

 sylvestris, Thiery de Menonville, Traite de la Culture du Nopal, 

 &c., p. 347 (1787), a work unknown to me. 



P. 98. To Calceolarice, Mask., add var. minor, Mask., Tr. N.Z., 

 Inst. xxix. 322. 



P. 146. To Ericerus add Eurycerus, Tozzetti, 1867, Mem. 

 Soc. Ital. iii. no. iii., 19. 



P. 158. To Chelonicoccus add Chelinococcus, Signoret, 1869, 

 Ann. S. Ent. France (4), ix. 104. 



P. 166. For " perforatus" (line 13) read "Coccus perforatum, 

 Kirkaldy," &c. 



P. 167. For Coccus use Calymmata (see above). 



P. 180, no. 906. Bead Eulecanium curtisi, n. n. = \\Coccus 

 aceris, Curtis nee Fabricius. 



P. 209. Ehizobium, Tozzetti, 1867, is " described", though 

 very scantily, and must replace Lecanopsis. The type, though 

 not specified, can be nothing but rhizophila (Signoret). 



P. 244. Eeplace " Lcucaspis, Targ.," by the following : — 

 Leucodiaspis, Signoret, 1869, Ann. Soc. Ent. France (4), 



ix. 99 ; type sif/noreti. 

 = II Leucaspis, Sign., 1870, op. cit. x. 100.* 



P. 314. Major, Cockerell nee Maskell. 



P. 318. Parlatoria, Sign., 1869, op. cit., ix. 99; types zyzyphus 

 (sic !) and proteus. 



N.B. — The genus Encarsia was listed under Coccidse in error 

 in the Zool. Bect)rd for 1895 ! 



P. 256, line 29. " Ohia " is a species of Metrosideros. 



P. 277, line 11 from bottom. After "Full." read "Trans. 

 Ent. S. London, 1897, p." 



P. 304. Lepidosaphes cockerelliana, n. n. for Mytilaspis 

 alius, Cockerell, nee Maskell, 1896. 



I regret that I cannot admit any names taken from Tozzetti's 

 Catalogue of 1868, 1 this work being to me of academic interest 

 only, consisting as it does of a confused series of names, without 

 descriptions or intelligible references. The correct references to 

 the following genera appear to me to be as follows : — 



■'• Leiicasjns is preoccupied by Burmeister, 1835, Arch, fiir Naturg. i. 

 pt. 2,p. 47. 



f Mrs. Fernald cites " 1869," but it is quoted in part of Signoret's 

 •' Essai," published in the volume for 18G8. 



