12 THE ENTOMOLOGIST. 
Hipocrita jacobee.—Two specimens have yellow hind wings 
and a yellow stripe and spots on the fore wing. One is from 
the Hope Collection. The other from near Southampton, taken 
about 1889 by the Rev. G. Hughes. 
Cybosia mesomella.—A male and two females from the Hope 
Collection are Haworth specimens. The male has yellow fore 
wings, and is labelled by him “eborina.” One of the females 
is labelled, also by him, ‘“‘ flavescens.” 
Lithosia deplana.—A fairly long series with considerable 
variation. A very large female from the Sellon Collection, 
taken in the New Forest, and another from the Meldola 
Collection taken at Horley, Surrey, have very dark greyish- 
brown fore wings with a strong dark yellow stripe along the 
costa extending to the apex, the hind wings being darkish grey. 
Two females from the Meldola Collection taken at Boxhill have 
rather bright yellow forewings (resembling pale specimens of 
’ L. sororcula) with paler hind wings. From the Hope Collection 
is a Haworth specimen labelled by him “ helvola.” 
L. griseola.— A Haworth specimen is labelled by him 
** ochreola.” 
L. griseola, ab. flava.—There are two Haworth specimens, 
one of which is labelled by him ‘‘flava, F.” 
Lithosia sericea.—Six specimens from Warrington. Four 
others from Chitty and Sellon Collections, unlabelled. 
L. caniola.a—A long series from §. Devon. One pure white 
= ab. lacteola, Boisd., a female, was taken by myself last 
August near Paignton. From the Meldola Collection are three 
specimens labelled ‘‘ Romney Marsh 1895.” 
Lithosia sororcula.—A Haworth specimen labelled by him 
* Aurantina. Pr.” 
Pelosia muscerda.—Two of the specimens from the Meldola 
Collection are labelled, one ‘‘ Kastry, Kent, 1903,” the other 
icon tel 907.7; 
(To be continued.) 
NOTES ON THE VARIATION OF PERONEA CRISTANA, 
FAB., WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF SIX NEW FORMS, 
AND THE REASONS FOR SINKING THE NAMES 
AT PRESENT IN USE OF SIX OTHERS. 
By W. G. SuHeupon, F.Z.S., F.E.S. 
(Continued from vol. liii, p. 271.) 
Ab. lichenana, Curtis. Webb writes of this (loc. cit., vol. xliv, 
p. 309): ‘‘ May perhaps be identical with subvittana, Stephs.” 
This is another case of not looking at the original description. 
