FURTHER NOTE ON COLIAS EDUSA, FAB. (CROCHEUS, FouRC.). 279 
Habitut.—I41 Baldio, Colombia. ¢ 2. 
The sexes are alike. 
Hresia callianthina, sp. nov. 
Exp. ¢ 12 in. 
Upper-side shining dark blue, the margins black. Fore wings with 
a large trifid basal patch of pale red, filling the whole of the cell, the 
basal half of the lower median interspace, and part of the middle 
median interspace, the part within the cell interrupted by a narrow 
black bar. Hind wings with the lower half of the inner margin red 
as far as the lower median branch. Underside yellowish brown with 
black veins and rays; red patch of fore wings more extended. 
Habitat.—Santa Elena, W. Colombia, 8000 ft. 2¢ 2. 
Nearest to H. neria, Hew., but differs in its blue ground- 
colour and red inner margin of hind wings. It is a good mimic 
of Actinote callianthe, Feld., together with which it flies. My 
specimens were taken in July. 
Hueides crystalina, sp. nov. 
Exp. 28 to 28 in. 
6 2. Allied to EH. heliconioides, Feld., but larger. Fore wings 
with the bone-yellow discal band broader than in Heliconzoides, but 
lying wholly outside the cell, a few specimens only having a small 
dot of this colour within the cell; a red streak below median vein 
and another on inner margin. Hind wings with a broad median band 
of bright scarlet, occupying nearly half the wing, the outer edge of 
the band nearly semicircular and slightly serrated. | Underside 
almost asin H. heliconioides, but the band of fore wings much broader 
and differently formed; hind wings with two submarginal series of 
small white spots. 
Habitat.—Crystalina, W. Colombia, 1100 ft. (June and July): 
14 $e. 
his species differs from 17. heliconioides and its allies in the 
broad and solid red band of the hind wings, which is even 
broader than in /. ricint, L. It resembles Heliconius clysonymus 
on the wing, but I did not observe the latter species in the same 
district. 
A FURTHER NOTE ON COLIAS HDUSA, FAB. (CROCEUS, 
FOURC.): ITS SEASONAL FORMS, VARIETIES AND 
ABERRATIONS. 
By H. Rowxnanp-Brown, M.A., F.E.S. 
By an oversight I omitted in my paper on Colias croceus, ete., 
to refer to the several notes on the species published by 
Prof. Cockerell in his papers ‘“‘On the Variation of Insects” 
(‘ Entom.,’ vol. xxii, 1889), e. g.— 
(q) His var. suffusa is not Tutt’s suffusa (1896). It is 
described as similar to the male figured in Newman’s ‘ British 
